* [PATCH v4 1/3] hw/smbios: code cleanup - use macro definitions for table header handles
2022-02-17 15:14 [PATCH v4 0/3] fix overlapping table handle numbers with large memory vms Ani Sinha
@ 2022-02-17 15:14 ` Ani Sinha
2022-02-17 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] hw/smbios: fix overlapping table handle numbers with large memory vms Ani Sinha
2022-02-17 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] hw/smbios: add assertion to ensure handles of tables 19 and 32 do not collide Ani Sinha
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ani Sinha @ 2022-02-17 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin, Igor Mammedov, Ani Sinha
This is a minor cleanup. Using macro definitions makes the code more
readable. It is at once clear which tables use which handle numbers in their
header. It also makes it easy to calculate the gaps between the numbers and
update them if needed.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
---
hw/smbios/smbios.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/smbios/smbios.c b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
index 6013df1698..56b412ce35 100644
--- a/hw/smbios/smbios.c
+++ b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
@@ -549,9 +549,23 @@ bool smbios_skip_table(uint8_t type, bool required_table)
return true;
}
+#define T0_BASE 0x000
+#define T1_BASE 0x100
+#define T2_BASE 0x200
+#define T3_BASE 0x300
+#define T4_BASE 0x400
+#define T11_BASE 0xe00
+
+#define T16_BASE 0x1000
+#define T17_BASE 0x1100
+#define T19_BASE 0x1300
+#define T32_BASE 0x2000
+#define T41_BASE 0x2900
+#define T127_BASE 0x7F00
+
static void smbios_build_type_0_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(0, 0x000, false); /* optional, leave up to BIOS */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(0, T0_BASE, false); /* optional, leave up to BIOS */
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(0, vendor_str, type0.vendor);
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(0, bios_version_str, type0.version);
@@ -599,7 +613,7 @@ static void smbios_encode_uuid(struct smbios_uuid *uuid, QemuUUID *in)
static void smbios_build_type_1_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(1, 0x100, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(1, T1_BASE, true); /* required */
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(1, manufacturer_str, type1.manufacturer);
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(1, product_name_str, type1.product);
@@ -619,7 +633,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_1_table(void)
static void smbios_build_type_2_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(2, 0x200, false); /* optional */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(2, T2_BASE, false); /* optional */
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(2, manufacturer_str, type2.manufacturer);
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(2, product_str, type2.product);
@@ -637,7 +651,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_2_table(void)
static void smbios_build_type_3_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(3, 0x300, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(3, T3_BASE, true); /* required */
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(3, manufacturer_str, type3.manufacturer);
t->type = 0x01; /* Other */
@@ -662,7 +676,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_4_table(MachineState *ms, unsigned instance)
{
char sock_str[128];
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(4, 0x400 + instance, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(4, T4_BASE + instance, true); /* required */
snprintf(sock_str, sizeof(sock_str), "%s%2x", type4.sock_pfx, instance);
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(4, socket_designation_str, sock_str);
@@ -702,7 +716,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_11_table(void)
return;
}
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(11, 0xe00, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(11, T11_BASE, true); /* required */
snprintf(count_str, sizeof(count_str), "%zu", type11.nvalues);
t->count = type11.nvalues;
@@ -722,7 +736,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_16_table(unsigned dimm_cnt)
{
uint64_t size_kb;
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(16, 0x1000, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(16, T16_BASE, true); /* required */
t->location = 0x01; /* Other */
t->use = 0x03; /* System memory */
@@ -749,7 +763,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_17_table(unsigned instance, uint64_t size)
char loc_str[128];
uint64_t size_mb;
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(17, 0x1100 + instance, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(17, T17_BASE + instance, true); /* required */
t->physical_memory_array_handle = cpu_to_le16(0x1000); /* Type 16 above */
t->memory_error_information_handle = cpu_to_le16(0xFFFE); /* Not provided */
@@ -790,7 +804,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_19_table(unsigned instance,
{
uint64_t end, start_kb, end_kb;
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(19, 0x1300 + instance, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(19, T19_BASE + instance, true); /* required */
end = start + size - 1;
assert(end > start);
@@ -814,7 +828,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_19_table(unsigned instance,
static void smbios_build_type_32_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(32, 0x2000, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(32, T32_BASE, true); /* required */
memset(t->reserved, 0, 6);
t->boot_status = 0; /* No errors detected */
@@ -828,7 +842,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_41_table(Error **errp)
struct type41_instance *t41;
QTAILQ_FOREACH(t41, &type41, next) {
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(41, 0x2900 + instance, true);
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(41, T41_BASE + instance, true);
SMBIOS_TABLE_SET_STR(41, reference_designation_str, t41->designation);
t->device_type = t41->kind;
@@ -871,7 +885,7 @@ static void smbios_build_type_41_table(Error **errp)
static void smbios_build_type_127_table(void)
{
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(127, 0x7F00, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(127, T127_BASE, true); /* required */
SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_POST;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/3] hw/smbios: fix overlapping table handle numbers with large memory vms
2022-02-17 15:14 [PATCH v4 0/3] fix overlapping table handle numbers with large memory vms Ani Sinha
2022-02-17 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] hw/smbios: code cleanup - use macro definitions for table header handles Ani Sinha
@ 2022-02-17 15:14 ` Ani Sinha
2022-02-17 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] hw/smbios: add assertion to ensure handles of tables 19 and 32 do not collide Ani Sinha
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ani Sinha @ 2022-02-17 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin, Igor Mammedov, Ani Sinha
The current smbios table implementation splits the main memory in 16 GiB
(DIMM like) chunks. With the current smbios table assignment code, we can have
only 512 such chunks before the 16 bit handle numbers in the header for tables
17 and 19 conflict. A guest with more than 8 TiB of memory will hit this
limitation and would fail with the following assertion in isa-debugcon:
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status = Already started)
ASSERT /builddir/build/BUILD/edk2-ca407c7246bf/OvmfPkg/SmbiosPlatformDxe/SmbiosPlatformDxe.c(125): !EFI_ERROR (Status)
This change adds an additional offset between tables 17 and 19 handle numbers
when configuring VMs larger than 8 TiB of memory. The value of the offset is
calculated to be equal to the additional space required to be reserved
in order to accomodate more DIMM entries without the table handles colliding.
In normal cases where the VM memory is smaller or equal to 8 TiB, this offset
value is 0. Hence in this case, no additional handle numbers are reserved and
table handle values remain as before.
Since smbios memory is not transmitted over the wire during migration,
this change can break migration for large memory vms if the guest is in the
middle of generating the tables during migration. However, in those
situations, qemu generates invalid table handles anyway with or without this
fix. Hence, we do not preserve the old bug by introducing compat knobs/machine
types.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023977
Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
---
hw/smbios/smbios.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
changelog:
v4: addressed Igor's suggestions on v3 with the commit log.
v3: reworded the commit log and comment in code.
diff --git a/hw/smbios/smbios.c b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
index 56b412ce35..44c53797a4 100644
--- a/hw/smbios/smbios.c
+++ b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
@@ -799,12 +799,13 @@ static void smbios_build_type_17_table(unsigned instance, uint64_t size)
SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_POST;
}
-static void smbios_build_type_19_table(unsigned instance,
+static void smbios_build_type_19_table(unsigned instance, unsigned offset,
uint64_t start, uint64_t size)
{
uint64_t end, start_kb, end_kb;
- SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(19, T19_BASE + instance, true); /* required */
+ SMBIOS_BUILD_TABLE_PRE(19, T19_BASE + offset + instance,
+ true); /* required */
end = start + size - 1;
assert(end > start);
@@ -996,7 +997,7 @@ void smbios_get_tables(MachineState *ms,
uint8_t **anchor, size_t *anchor_len,
Error **errp)
{
- unsigned i, dimm_cnt;
+ unsigned i, dimm_cnt, offset;
if (smbios_legacy) {
*tables = *anchor = NULL;
@@ -1026,6 +1027,16 @@ void smbios_get_tables(MachineState *ms,
dimm_cnt = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(current_machine->ram_size, MAX_DIMM_SZ) / MAX_DIMM_SZ;
+ /*
+ * The offset determines if we need to keep additional space betweeen
+ * table 17 and table 19 header handle numbers so that they do
+ * not overlap. For example, for a VM with larger than 8 TB guest
+ * memory and DIMM like chunks of 16 GiB, the default space between
+ * the two tables (T19_BASE - T17_BASE = 512) is not enough.
+ */
+ offset = (dimm_cnt > (T19_BASE - T17_BASE)) ? \
+ dimm_cnt - (T19_BASE - T17_BASE) : 0;
+
smbios_build_type_16_table(dimm_cnt);
for (i = 0; i < dimm_cnt; i++) {
@@ -1033,7 +1044,7 @@ void smbios_get_tables(MachineState *ms,
}
for (i = 0; i < mem_array_size; i++) {
- smbios_build_type_19_table(i, mem_array[i].address,
+ smbios_build_type_19_table(i, offset, mem_array[i].address,
mem_array[i].length);
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread