From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B48AC433EF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRIN3-0002Cv-Bx for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:46:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRI3u-0005vT-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:26:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:47968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRI3r-0006tB-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:26:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1646677582; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aOA6hzbYeg9F/+fgrAqjiqtkdD1VW3VcKn/1qNtJN2A=; b=JT1pLacHITwhFy8NlmdJvz9+cFNw7j4ELwRkkWWUplfnsT+4xW+rNQfoq6pPOxg1XdmBaZ d8eNEOX5Xwlqum1TXsfFRBsUkIi0RNSUH82LFsnDeRrL1y5yuZ2Wfgraz49mhbC9TlGNoB 6O9bVGZQew2q47vbfmBx2RNrKapaAsc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-517-cwgx1AYpM1iWRXBZNCrHyA-1; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:26:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cwgx1AYpM1iWRXBZNCrHyA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD61824FA6; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.com (unknown [10.39.192.10]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B06780FC5; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:26:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 1/7] tests/tcg/s390x: Fix mvc, mvo and pack tests with Clang Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:26:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20220307182609.94466-2-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220307182609.94466-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20220307182609.94466-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , David Hildenbrand Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" These instructions use addressing with a "base address", meaning that if register r0 is used, it is always treated as zero, no matter what value is stored in the register. So we have to make sure not to use register r0 for these instructions in our tests. There was no problem with GCC so far since it seems to always pick other registers by default, but Clang likes to chose register r0, too, so we have to use the "a" constraint to make sure that it does not pick r0 here. Message-Id: <20220301093911.1450719-1-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- tests/tcg/s390x/mvc.c | 4 ++-- tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c | 4 ++-- tests/tcg/s390x/pack.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvc.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvc.c index aa552d52e5..7ae4c44550 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvc.c +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvc.c @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ static inline void mvc_256(const char *dst, const char *src) asm volatile ( " mvc 0(256,%[dst]),0(%[src])\n" : - : [dst] "d" (dst), - [src] "d" (src) + : [dst] "a" (dst), + [src] "a" (src) : "memory"); } diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c index 5546fe2a97..0c3ecdde2e 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ int main(void) asm volatile ( " mvo 0(4,%[dest]),0(3,%[src])\n" : - : [dest] "d" (dest + 1), - [src] "d" (src + 1) + : [dest] "a" (dest + 1), + [src] "a" (src + 1) : "memory"); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(expected); i++) { diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/pack.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/pack.c index 4be36f29a7..55e7e214e8 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/pack.c +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/pack.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ int main(void) asm volatile( " pack 2(4,%[data]),2(4,%[data])\n" : - : [data] "r" (&data[0]) + : [data] "a" (&data[0]) : "memory"); for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { if (data[i] != exp[i]) { -- 2.27.0