From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0ECC433EF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaTA-00035m-Km for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:05:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaHK-0007Vq-Of; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:53:30 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::829] (port=39437 helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaHJ-00053p-1O; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:53:30 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id u29so611302qtc.6; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 05:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=YQrUVaqHJM9HWSAZ1hemk/z4wOBte6SO+9I0vIiF5tw=; b=o7FudXFshCVYt8GFlJF6lJq7KE/QXSc9igtFIFEU2uCmEx8ca9PfAr1Ls/y+2+cCfG YPxesYU65EObEUTsJaOG99L8RzBvHWePZwpdEO3FIdj2jfLdzYw2rBIkypaPDEcVYrhF D8QK+412OWwPWY2TWVp1WkjtdvF3Z9YDyBRo8sWuDeWNz2LuSlcC94xw82J8jPBL3nhE Jfg0Qt0TlZh9TbM557S8W1dWLP5GT7AU9921jTUZ+U88ShhH7/g9kOHPEg4bZmiIrG6b ++e/vhUTHl/qSkY6F1eTR4ERLKZ8DmaEGxF6xFu1BSRY+qw5VzOl38suvOePuPwoRpZq jbfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :reply-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=YQrUVaqHJM9HWSAZ1hemk/z4wOBte6SO+9I0vIiF5tw=; b=8RkdKtxmg47vFlhLCV4AJ1RW+Yeh/hQz+A49w58UMOvmjgQ5phDN14hrzseoSCTzOT 6mf4KyAgcExjRG08c39JJMVVydilSSusRXwNb0tGof4vZht4ADejRQYRjbU+czfuB5XJ DS47dHza95lFNo5FT9CdoZSjk2bw1GZ3qtscRL2gP4o6cw9EyeIlcJkXttqrjfwNWXfz KpzwcA6GU17c26SIiig01+PiVEyO2SPCeTCnmxlsyrP5R6sJGMnOUFJrE4AS50r4pHRP tANErf1GOk4ZKOm+vuZwO+oGrvhOP5zU1xryCGs4Rn76mRHTs8Lsz+4i7B8VOD2q79uh jVzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+oAIduSsb9Br9wl7QhDnRqa8dCjOEfQOKf7on9G4d0N6J8Vr5 s1UtmpfKShYnAcGx9cJtFJh0fONBJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwawliD+7b/2fhMYLwin6HMa1SZJRikyVjIuEYEMEfJa7+u5VLVlBecBQvHYcVDx4SZmX0BPA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5f91:0:b0:2de:2c33:53a0 with SMTP id j17-20020ac85f91000000b002de2c3353a0mr13535812qta.86.1646747607209; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 05:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from serve.minyard.net ([47.184.144.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12-20020a05620a14ac00b0060deaee7a21sm7618790qkj.51.2022.03.08.05.53.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 05:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from minyard.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b8f6:1b:c14:fa13:8678:3728]) by serve.minyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EB0D1800BC; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 13:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:53:24 -0600 From: Corey Minyard To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] This patch series contains updates to PMBus in QEMU along with some PMBus device models for Renesas regulators. I have also added myself to MAINTAINERS as this code is in use daily, where I am responsible for it. Message-ID: <20220308135324.GU3457@minyard.net> References: <20220302015053.1984165-1-titusr@google.com> <20220304214354.GL3457@minyard.net> <1af23dba-8f7a-8d93-706d-6e16067cdce2@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1af23dba-8f7a-8d93-706d-6e16067cdce2@gmail.com> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::829 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::829; envelope-from=tcminyard@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Titus Rwantare , venture@google.com, f4bug@amsat.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wuhaotsh@google.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:00:02AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 5/3/22 00:42, Titus Rwantare wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 13:43, Corey Minyard wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:50:44PM -0800, Titus Rwantare wrote: > > > > v2: > > > > - split PMBus commit with updates into individual fixes > > > > - renamed isl_pmbus[.ch] adding _vr for voltage regulators > > > > > > > > v3: > > > > - split uint refactor commit and removed commit renaming files > > > > - rename rolled into preceding commits > > > > - update commit description for uint refactoring change > > > > > > This all looks good to me: > > > > > > Acked-by: Corey Minyard > > > > > > Do you have a plan for getting this in to qemu? Like through the ARM > > > tree? I could take it into an I2C tree, but there's really not much > > > activity or work there. > > > > > > -corey > > > > In general PMBus is more specific to i2c than ARM, but I'm not sure of > > the QEMU implications. > > Titus, could you address my comments? > > Corey, if you are busy, I can take care of this series. It's not a "too busy" sort of thing, the i2c tree doesn't get much traffic. I can take it, but it's not much different than just pulling it directly. So it's probably best if you take it. Thanks, -corey > > Regards, > > Phil. >