From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] target/s390x: kvm: Honor storage keys during emulation
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 17:39:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220506153956.2217601-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506153956.2217601-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Storage key controlled protection is currently not honored when
emulating instructions.
If available, enable key protection for the MEM_OP ioctl, thereby
enabling it for the s390_cpu_virt_mem_* functions, when using kvm.
As a result, the emulation of the following instructions honors storage
keys:
* CLP
The Synch I/O CLP command would need special handling in order
to support storage keys, but is currently not supported.
* CHSC
Performing commands asynchronously would require special
handling, but commands are currently always synchronous.
* STSI
* TSCH
Must (and does) not change channel if terminated due to
protection.
* MSCH
Suppressed on protection, works because fetching instruction.
* SSCH
Suppressed on protection, works because fetching instruction.
* STSCH
* STCRW
Suppressed on protection, this works because no partial store is
possible, because the operand cannot span multiple pages.
* PCISTB
* MPCIFC
* STPCIFC
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index 53098bf541..7bd8db0e7b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -151,12 +151,15 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
static int cap_sync_regs;
static int cap_async_pf;
static int cap_mem_op;
+static int cap_mem_op_extension;
static int cap_s390_irq;
static int cap_ri;
static int cap_hpage_1m;
static int cap_vcpu_resets;
static int cap_protected;
+static bool mem_op_storage_key_support;
+
static int active_cmma;
static int kvm_s390_query_mem_limit(uint64_t *memory_limit)
@@ -354,6 +357,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
+ cap_mem_op_extension = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
+ mem_op_storage_key_support = cap_mem_op_extension > 0;
cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ);
cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS);
cap_protected = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED);
@@ -842,6 +847,7 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
: KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ,
.buf = (uint64_t)hostbuf,
.ar = ar,
+ .key = (cpu->env.psw.mask & PSW_MASK_KEY) >> PSW_SHIFT_KEY,
};
int ret;
@@ -851,6 +857,9 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
if (!hostbuf) {
mem_op.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY;
}
+ if (mem_op_storage_key_support) {
+ mem_op.flags |= KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION;
+ }
ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &mem_op);
if (ret < 0) {
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 15:39 [PATCH 0/2] s390x: kvm: Honor storage keys during emulation Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-06 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Pull in MEMOP changes in linux-headers Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-06 15:39 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2022-05-19 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] target/s390x: kvm: Honor storage keys during emulation Thomas Huth
2022-05-19 13:53 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-24 10:43 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-24 11:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-24 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-24 11:52 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-25 9:00 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-24 16:08 ` Halil Pasic
2022-05-09 8:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] s390x: " Cornelia Huck
2022-05-10 13:32 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-10 13:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-05-12 8:52 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220506153956.2217601-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).