qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, eduardo@habkost.net,
	jon.grimm@amd.com, Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pc: q35: Bump max_cpus to 512
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:37:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220510133758.5495372c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ynoe242xK4d5kNwk@redhat.com>

On Tue, 10 May 2022 09:14:19 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:03:25AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2022 13:03:38 +0100
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 09:12:49AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
> > > > On Wed, 4 May 2022 08:16:39 -0500
> > > > Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > This is the maximum number of vCPU supported by
> > > > > the AMD x2APIC virtualization.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> > > > > index 302288342a..e82b1c690d 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> > > > > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void pc_q35_machine_options(MachineClass *m)
> > > > >      machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(m, TYPE_INTEL_IOMMU_DEVICE);
> > > > >      machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(m, TYPE_RAMFB_DEVICE);
> > > > >      machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(m, TYPE_VMBUS_BRIDGE);
> > > > > -    m->max_cpus = 288;
> > > > > +    m->max_cpus = 512;    
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe we should bump it to KVM VCPU maximum,
> > > > and make sure we error out if asked for combination of
> > > > hardware/irqchip is not usable.    
> > > 
> > > In RHEL downstream we currently bump this to 710 CPUs, because you
> > > overflow the SMBIOS 2.1 tables at approx 720 CPUs (give/take a little
> > > depending on other config options).  
> > 
> > Also there were some testing done with 1024,
> > but my main reason for matching KVM's limit is unblock upstream
> > testing so it would be easier to push limits for others.
> > Downstream can clamp that value down to whatever it deems as supported.
> >   
> > > Going beyond 710 CPUs value requires using the SMBIOS 3 entry point.
> > > 
> > > AFAIK, the x86 machine types still default to SMBIOS 2.1, so that
> > > would need changing too.  
> > 
> > Yep, we can change default to SMBIOS 3 starting with new machine type (7.1?)
> > or conditionally depending on requested number of CPUs,
> > though I'd prefer machine type approach.  
> 
> Agree, machine type is better IMHO, a it gives us a consistent guest
> ABI regardless of CPU count.
> 
> > As for SMBIOS 3, we still have to update CPU structures to support more than
> > 255 vcpus (Julia was working on it). It's long standing bug, but that doesn't
> > seem to be critical, as guest boots fine with old structures.  
> 
> What's the impact of SMBIOS 3 being limited to 255 ?  That's lower than
> the current max CPUs of 288 in upstream / 710 in downstream.

possibly users that look into SMBIOS for licensing purposes and/or inventory
Julia told me that dmidecode somehow figures out correct number of total vcpus.

CCing Julia for patches ETA.

> 
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-04 13:16 [PATCH] pc: q35: Bump max_cpus to 512 Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-09  7:12 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-09 11:41   ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2022-05-10  7:06     ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-09 12:03   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-10  7:03     ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-10  8:14       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-10 11:37         ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2022-05-19  7:47           ` Julia Suvorova
2022-05-13 11:23   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-05-19  6:53     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 12:37       ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-19 13:43         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220510133758.5495372c@redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=jusual@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).