From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] aio_wait_kick: add missing memory barrier
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:30:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524173054.12651-1-eesposit@redhat.com> (raw)
It seems that aio_wait_kick always required a memory barrier
or atomic operation in the caller, but nobody actually
took care of doing it.
Let's put the barrier in the function instead, and pair it
with another one in AIO_WAIT_WHILE. Read aio_wait_kick()
comment for further explanation.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
include/block/aio-wait.h | 2 ++
util/aio-wait.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/block/aio-wait.h b/include/block/aio-wait.h
index b39eefb38d..54840f8622 100644
--- a/include/block/aio-wait.h
+++ b/include/block/aio-wait.h
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ extern AioWait global_aio_wait;
AioContext *ctx_ = (ctx); \
/* Increment wait_->num_waiters before evaluating cond. */ \
qatomic_inc(&wait_->num_waiters); \
+ /* Paired with smp_mb in aio_wait_kick(). */ \
+ smp_mb(); \
if (ctx_ && in_aio_context_home_thread(ctx_)) { \
while ((cond)) { \
aio_poll(ctx_, true); \
diff --git a/util/aio-wait.c b/util/aio-wait.c
index bdb3d3af22..98c5accd29 100644
--- a/util/aio-wait.c
+++ b/util/aio-wait.c
@@ -35,7 +35,21 @@ static void dummy_bh_cb(void *opaque)
void aio_wait_kick(void)
{
- /* The barrier (or an atomic op) is in the caller. */
+ /*
+ * Paired with smp_mb in AIO_WAIT_WHILE. Here we have:
+ * write(condition);
+ * aio_wait_kick() {
+ * smp_mb();
+ * read(num_waiters);
+ * }
+ *
+ * And in AIO_WAIT_WHILE:
+ * write(num_waiters);
+ * smp_mb();
+ * read(condition);
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+
if (qatomic_read(&global_aio_wait.num_waiters)) {
aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(qemu_get_aio_context(), dummy_bh_cb, NULL);
}
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 17:30 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2022-05-24 18:30 ` [PATCH] aio_wait_kick: add missing memory barrier Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-25 14:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-30 13:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-06-04 12:51 ` Roman Kagan
2022-06-05 6:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524173054.12651-1-eesposit@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).