From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EBAC433EF for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nta1n-0008FL-Co for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:17:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntZon-0001c1-Ag; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:03:46 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:64826 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntZol-0005qW-Ex; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:03:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24OHj4Au010829; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=BDAFlxTuZQbI6GJhHnntYp/wf7waq1uxCgZ3T8vCkeQ=; b=mGoQsT7sJSEMl9zB57UJZ19i31//jt6gm6wr3UgVuzTVH1mdKZ9aNEQQl2R7FDAD2rX4 7fTSCnkv61u5E9F2EDPUG55b8cKQ9SmArLicFHVOYMbUrLJ4BnXwcdLQkvBPe8f+oQO4 66Dj6aG7VaxVaWzVuiG8np0f/4yFnbm/dGeBRvNgfy+1LCQob4svTLCf32Viq8vejunQ 9TZS7aJ4/xOpzIe6KcHj6HHmQKba8wIgi+ICXumTG0yO3RdTNM0iWxWph/lnfVlmK8+n 1EL/iw8j4qZVnMF9vAs54A8CRQiRVytVGtXRsmDi9cQ63hraRnqIcqm/zxId/jPjSdIC eg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g941phdta-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:41 +0000 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24OISTOO008451; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:41 GMT Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g941phdsp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:41 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24OJ2ug7015882; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:40 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3g93v80q6y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:40 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24OJ3db863242596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:39 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DAC124055; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D85124053; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c92d2ccc-254b-11b2-a85c-a700b5bfb098.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.163.3.233]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:03:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Matthew Rosato To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 7/8] s390x/pci: let intercept devices have separate PCI groups Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:03:04 -0400 Message-Id: <20220524190305.140717-8-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220524190305.140717-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220524190305.140717-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ZHOJWI6Y6o2EW9pQmc-zR892XjY3Rdyl X-Proofpoint-GUID: OrdgUfN_gefDm34vGx-4ojQmkxApgicO X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-24_09,2022-05-23_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2205240094 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Let's use the reserved pool of simulated PCI groups to allow intercept devices to have separate groups from interpreted devices as some group values may be different. If we run out of simulated PCI groups, subsequent intercept devices just get the default group. Furthermore, if we encounter any PCI groups from hostdevs that are marked as simulated, let's just assign them to the default group to avoid conflicts between host simulated groups and our own simulated groups. Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-- hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 6 ++++- 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c index e66a0dfbef..5342f7899f 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c @@ -748,13 +748,14 @@ static void s390_pci_iommu_free(S390pciState *s, PCIBus *bus, int32_t devfn) object_unref(OBJECT(iommu)); } -S390PCIGroup *s390_group_create(int id) +S390PCIGroup *s390_group_create(int id, int host_id) { S390PCIGroup *group; S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb(); group = g_new0(S390PCIGroup, 1); group->id = id; + group->host_id = host_id; QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s->zpci_groups, group, link); return group; } @@ -772,12 +773,25 @@ S390PCIGroup *s390_group_find(int id) return NULL; } +S390PCIGroup *s390_group_find_host_sim(int host_id) +{ + S390PCIGroup *group; + S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb(); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(group, &s->zpci_groups, link) { + if (group->id >= ZPCI_SIM_GRP_START && group->host_id == host_id) { + return group; + } + } + return NULL; +} + static void s390_pci_init_default_group(void) { S390PCIGroup *group; ClpRspQueryPciGrp *resgrp; - group = s390_group_create(ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP); + group = s390_group_create(ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP, ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP); resgrp = &group->zpci_group; resgrp->fr = 1; resgrp->dasm = 0; @@ -825,6 +839,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) NULL, g_free); s->zpci_table = g_hash_table_new_full(g_int_hash, g_int_equal, NULL, NULL); s->bus_no = 0; + s->next_sim_grp = ZPCI_SIM_GRP_START; QTAILQ_INIT(&s->pending_sei); QTAILQ_INIT(&s->zpci_devs); QTAILQ_INIT(&s->zpci_dma_limit); diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c index 4bf0a7e22d..985980f021 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c @@ -150,13 +150,18 @@ static void s390_pci_read_group(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, { struct vfio_info_cap_header *hdr; struct vfio_device_info_cap_zpci_group *cap; + S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb(); ClpRspQueryPciGrp *resgrp; VFIOPCIDevice *vpci = container_of(pbdev->pdev, VFIOPCIDevice, pdev); + uint8_t start_gid = pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid; hdr = vfio_get_device_info_cap(info, VFIO_DEVICE_INFO_CAP_ZPCI_GROUP); - /* If capability not provided, just use the default group */ - if (hdr == NULL) { + /* + * If capability not provided or the underlying hostdev is simulated, just + * use the default group. + */ + if (hdr == NULL || pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid >= ZPCI_SIM_GRP_START) { trace_s390_pci_clp_cap(vpci->vbasedev.name, VFIO_DEVICE_INFO_CAP_ZPCI_GROUP); pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid = ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP; @@ -165,11 +170,40 @@ static void s390_pci_read_group(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, } cap = (void *) hdr; + /* + * For an intercept device, let's use an existing simulated group if one + * one was already created for other intercept devices in this group. + * If not, create a new simulated group if any are still available. + * If all else fails, just fall back on the default group. + */ + if (!pbdev->interp) { + pbdev->pci_group = s390_group_find_host_sim(pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid); + if (pbdev->pci_group) { + /* Use existing simulated group */ + pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid = pbdev->pci_group->id; + return; + } else { + if (s->next_sim_grp == ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP) { + /* All out of simulated groups, use default */ + trace_s390_pci_clp_cap(vpci->vbasedev.name, + VFIO_DEVICE_INFO_CAP_ZPCI_GROUP); + pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid = ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP; + pbdev->pci_group = s390_group_find(ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP); + return; + } else { + /* We can assign a new simulated group */ + pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid = s->next_sim_grp; + s->next_sim_grp++; + /* Fall through to create the new sim group using CLP info */ + } + } + } + /* See if the PCI group is already defined, create if not */ pbdev->pci_group = s390_group_find(pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid); if (!pbdev->pci_group) { - pbdev->pci_group = s390_group_create(pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid); + pbdev->pci_group = s390_group_create(pbdev->zpci_fn.pfgid, start_gid); resgrp = &pbdev->pci_group->zpci_group; if (cap->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_INFO_ZPCI_FLAG_REFRESH) { diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h index 5b09f0cf2f..0605fcea24 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h @@ -315,13 +315,16 @@ typedef struct ZpciFmb { QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(ZpciFmb, fmt0) != 48, "padding in ZpciFmb"); #define ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP 0xFF +#define ZPCI_SIM_GRP_START 0xF0 typedef struct S390PCIGroup { ClpRspQueryPciGrp zpci_group; int id; + int host_id; QTAILQ_ENTRY(S390PCIGroup) link; } S390PCIGroup; -S390PCIGroup *s390_group_create(int id); +S390PCIGroup *s390_group_create(int id, int host_id); S390PCIGroup *s390_group_find(int id); +S390PCIGroup *s390_group_find_host_sim(int host_id); struct S390PCIBusDevice { DeviceState qdev; @@ -370,6 +373,7 @@ struct S390pciState { QTAILQ_HEAD(, S390PCIBusDevice) zpci_devs; QTAILQ_HEAD(, S390PCIDMACount) zpci_dma_limit; QTAILQ_HEAD(, S390PCIGroup) zpci_groups; + uint8_t next_sim_grp; }; S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void); -- 2.27.0