qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Łukasz Gieryk" <lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Cc: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/nvme: clean up CC register write logic
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:06:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220607110645.GA28312@lgieryk-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YppuEyXp/iL06z/C@apples>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Jun  1 15:28, Lukasz Maniak wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 09:35:24AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > > 
> > > +        stl_le_p(&n->bar.intms, 0);
> > > +        stl_le_p(&n->bar.intmc, 0);
> > > +        stl_le_p(&n->bar.cc, 0);
> > 
> > Looks fine, though it seems the NVMe spec says the above registers
> > should be cleared during each reset for VF as well.
> > 
> 
> Aren't the values of all other registers than CSTS just undefined? (NVMe
> v2.0b, Section 8.26.3)

My 2 cents –

When VF is online:
- Both Controller Reset (CR) and PCIe Function Level Reset (FLR) can be
  issued to given VF
- Both resets shall return all (except specific) Nvme registers of given
  VF to their reset values (3.7.2)

When VF is offline:
- CR cannot be issued (only CSTS is defined, writes to CC are dropped),
  so doesn’t need an explicit IF
- FLR is allowed as it’s a part of the procedure to bring VF online
  (mentioned in 8.26.3)
- At least FLR shall reset the registers for VF

So I agree with the other Lukasz's suggestion. I would also clear
intms/intmc/cc for both: VF and PF reset paths, regardless of the actual
reset type.



  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25  7:35 [PATCH v2] hw/nvme: clean up CC register write logic Klaus Jensen
2022-06-01 13:28 ` Lukasz Maniak
2022-06-03 20:24   ` Klaus Jensen
2022-06-07 11:06     ` Łukasz Gieryk [this message]
2022-06-07 11:23       ` Klaus Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220607110645.GA28312@lgieryk-VirtualBox \
    --to=lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).