From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:08:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220607120835.0b9e9cfb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMDeoFXrgTbG846RfURzEHZv+W+t9LmJ-M-p1uSk07NW_UR9Dg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:38:57 +0200
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:20 PM Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 May 2022 18:56:50 +0200
> > Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The new test is run with a large number of cpus and checks if the
> > > core_count field in smbios_cpu_test (structure type 4) is correct.
> > >
> > > Choose q35 as it allows to run with -smp > 255.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > > index 0ba9d749a5..f2464adaa0 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > > +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> > > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ typedef struct {
> > > smbios_entry_point smbios_ep_table;
> > > uint16_t smbios_cpu_max_speed;
> > > uint16_t smbios_cpu_curr_speed;
> > > + uint8_t smbios_core_count;
> > > + uint16_t smbios_core_count2;
> > > uint8_t *required_struct_types;
> > > int required_struct_types_len;
> > > QTestState *qts;
> > > @@ -640,8 +642,9 @@ static inline bool smbios_single_instance(uint8_t type)
> > >
> > > static bool smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> > > {
> > > + uint8_t real_cc, expect_cc = data->smbios_core_count;
> >
> > %s/expect/expected/
> > also I'd s/real_cc/core_count/
> >
> > > + uint16_t real, real_cc2, expect_cc2 = data->smbios_core_count2;
> > ditto
> >
> > > uint16_t expect_speed[2];
> > > - uint16_t real;
> > > int offset[2];
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > @@ -660,6 +663,20 @@ static bool smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + real_cc = qtest_readb(data->qts, addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, core_count));
> > > + real_cc2 = qtest_readw(data->qts, addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, core_count2));
> > > +
> > > + if (expect_cc && (real_cc != expect_cc)) {
> > > + fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected SMBIOS CPU count: real %u expect %u\n",
> > > + real_cc, expect_cc);
> > > + return false;
> >
> > since you are rewriting it anyways, how about
> > if (expect_cc) {
> > g_assert_cmpuint(...)
> > }
> >
> > instead of printing/propagating error
>
> That works. But I still need to return something, unless you want to
> change the original code too.
just change it, as it makes code simpler (maybe a separate patch
that should go before this one)
>
> Best regards, Julia Suvorova.
>
> > > + }
> > > + if ((expect_cc == 0xFF) && (real_cc2 != expect_cc2)) {
> > > + fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected SMBIOS CPU count2: real %u expect %u\n",
> > > + real_cc2, expect_cc2);
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -905,6 +922,21 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg(void)
> > > free_test_data(&data);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2(void)
> > > +{
> > > + test_data data = {
> > > + .machine = MACHINE_Q35,
> > > + .variant = ".core-count2",
> > > + .required_struct_types = base_required_struct_types,
> > > + .required_struct_types_len = ARRAY_SIZE(base_required_struct_types),
> > > + .smbios_core_count = 0xFF,
> > > + .smbios_core_count2 = 275,
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + test_acpi_one("-machine smbios-entry-point-type=64 -smp 275", &data);
> > > + free_test_data(&data);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge(void)
> > > {
> > > test_data data;
> > > @@ -1787,6 +1819,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/pci-hotplug/off",
> > > test_acpi_piix4_no_acpi_pci_hotplug);
> > > qtest_add_func("acpi/q35", test_acpi_q35_tcg);
> > > + qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/core-count2", test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2);
> > > qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/bridge", test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge);
> > > qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/multif-bridge", test_acpi_q35_multif_bridge);
> > > qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/mmio64", test_acpi_q35_tcg_mmio64);
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 16:56 [PATCH 0/5] hw/smbios: add core_count2 to smbios table type 4 Julia Suvorova
2022-05-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Julia Suvorova
2022-05-28 4:34 ` Ani Sinha
2022-05-31 12:40 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-02 14:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-06-02 14:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-06-06 11:11 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-07 9:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] bios-tables-test: teach test to use smbios 3.0 tables Julia Suvorova
2022-05-30 6:10 ` Ani Sinha
2022-05-31 12:39 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-02 15:04 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-06-06 10:52 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-07 9:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-05-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] tests/acpi: allow changes for core_count2 test Julia Suvorova
2022-05-28 5:28 ` Ani Sinha
2022-05-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255 Julia Suvorova
2022-05-28 5:22 ` Ani Sinha
2022-05-31 12:22 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-05-31 13:14 ` Ani Sinha
2022-05-31 15:05 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-01 5:09 ` Ani Sinha
2022-06-01 5:06 ` Ani Sinha
2022-06-02 15:20 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-06-02 16:31 ` Ani Sinha
2022-06-06 11:38 ` Julia Suvorova
2022-06-07 10:08 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2022-05-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests/acpi: update tables for new core count test Julia Suvorova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220607120835.0b9e9cfb@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ani@anisinha.ca \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).