From: "Łukasz Gieryk" <lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com>,
Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hw/nvme: clean up CC register write logic
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 11:04:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220608090435.GA29771@lgieryk-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607112320.58532-1-its@irrelevant.dk>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:23:20PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
>
> The SRIOV series exposed an issued with how CC register writes are
> handled and how CSTS is set in response to that. Specifically, after
> applying the SRIOV series, the controller could end up in a state with
> CC.EN set to '1' but with CSTS.RDY cleared to '0', causing drivers to
> expect CSTS.RDY to transition to '1' but timing out.
>
> Clean this up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Maniak <lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * clear intms/intmc/cc regardless of reset type
>
> hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> index 658584d417fe..a558f5cb29c1 100644
> --- a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> +++ b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> @@ -6190,10 +6190,15 @@ static void nvme_ctrl_reset(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeResetType rst)
>
> if (pci_is_vf(pci_dev)) {
> sctrl = nvme_sctrl(n);
> +
> stl_le_p(&n->bar.csts, sctrl->scs ? 0 : NVME_CSTS_FAILED);
> } else {
> stl_le_p(&n->bar.csts, 0);
> }
> +
> + stl_le_p(&n->bar.intms, 0);
> + stl_le_p(&n->bar.intmc, 0);
> + stl_le_p(&n->bar.cc, 0);
> }
>
> static void nvme_ctrl_shutdown(NvmeCtrl *n)
> @@ -6405,20 +6410,21 @@ static void nvme_write_bar(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr offset, uint64_t data,
> nvme_irq_check(n);
> break;
> case NVME_REG_CC:
> + stl_le_p(&n->bar.cc, data);
> +
> trace_pci_nvme_mmio_cfg(data & 0xffffffff);
>
> - /* Windows first sends data, then sends enable bit */
> - if (!NVME_CC_EN(data) && !NVME_CC_EN(cc) &&
> - !NVME_CC_SHN(data) && !NVME_CC_SHN(cc))
> - {
> - cc = data;
> + if (NVME_CC_SHN(data) && !(NVME_CC_SHN(cc))) {
> + trace_pci_nvme_mmio_shutdown_set();
> + nvme_ctrl_shutdown(n);
> + csts &= ~(CSTS_SHST_MASK << CSTS_SHST_SHIFT);
> + csts |= NVME_CSTS_SHST_COMPLETE;
> + } else if (!NVME_CC_SHN(data) && NVME_CC_SHN(cc)) {
> + trace_pci_nvme_mmio_shutdown_cleared();
> + csts &= ~(CSTS_SHST_MASK << CSTS_SHST_SHIFT);
> }
>
> if (NVME_CC_EN(data) && !NVME_CC_EN(cc)) {
> - cc = data;
> -
> - /* flush CC since nvme_start_ctrl() needs the value */
> - stl_le_p(&n->bar.cc, cc);
> if (unlikely(nvme_start_ctrl(n))) {
> trace_pci_nvme_err_startfail();
> csts = NVME_CSTS_FAILED;
> @@ -6429,22 +6435,10 @@ static void nvme_write_bar(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr offset, uint64_t data,
> } else if (!NVME_CC_EN(data) && NVME_CC_EN(cc)) {
> trace_pci_nvme_mmio_stopped();
> nvme_ctrl_reset(n, NVME_RESET_CONTROLLER);
> - cc = 0;
> - csts &= ~NVME_CSTS_READY;
> - }
>
> - if (NVME_CC_SHN(data) && !(NVME_CC_SHN(cc))) {
> - trace_pci_nvme_mmio_shutdown_set();
> - nvme_ctrl_shutdown(n);
> - cc = data;
> - csts |= NVME_CSTS_SHST_COMPLETE;
> - } else if (!NVME_CC_SHN(data) && NVME_CC_SHN(cc)) {
> - trace_pci_nvme_mmio_shutdown_cleared();
> - csts &= ~NVME_CSTS_SHST_COMPLETE;
> - cc = data;
> + break;
> }
>
> - stl_le_p(&n->bar.cc, cc);
> stl_le_p(&n->bar.csts, csts);
>
> break;
> --
> 2.36.1
Reviewed-by: Łukasz Gieryk <lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-08 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 11:23 [PATCH v3] hw/nvme: clean up CC register write logic Klaus Jensen
2022-06-07 12:23 ` Lukasz Maniak
2022-06-08 9:04 ` Łukasz Gieryk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220608090435.GA29771@lgieryk-VirtualBox \
--to=lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.maniak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).