From: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] block: Keep auto_backing_file post-migration
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:44:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220803144446.20723-1-hreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1117 reports the following
issue:
Say you have a VM with a backing chain of images where the image
metadata contains json:{} backing file strings, which however will be
resolved to simple plain filenames when opened[1].
So when these images are opened, bs->auto_backing_file is first read
directly from the image header, and will thus contain a json:{}
filename. The backing image is opened based off of this filename, and
bdrv_refresh_filename() simplfies the filename as shown[1]. We then
update bs->auto_backing_file from bs->backing->bs->filename, so both are
equal.
It is quite important that both are equal, because
bdrv_backing_overridden() checks whether the backing file has been
changed from the default by comparing bs->auto_backing_file to
bs->backing->bs->filename.
Because we did set bs->auto_backing_file from bs->backing->bs->filename,
both are equal, the backing file is not considered overridden, and
bdrv_refresh_filename(bs) will not consider it necessary to generate a
json:{} filename for the overlay.
Then the VM is migrated.
The destination side invokes bdrv_invalidate_cache(), which by qcow2 and
qed is implemented by closing the image and opening it. This re-reads
the backing file string from disk, resetting bs->auto_backing_file.
Now, it will contains the json:{} filename again and thus differ from
bs->backing->bs->filename.
Consequentially, a subsequent bdrv_refresh_filename(bs) will find that
the overlayâs backing file has been overridden and generate a json:{}
filename, which isnât great.
This series fixes that by having qcow2âs and qedâs image-open operations
not overwrite bs->auto_backing_file unless something has changed since
the last time we read the backing filename from the metadata.
Now, generating a json:{} filename can be a nuisance but shouldnât be a
real problem. The actual problem reported in 1117 comes later, namely
when creating a snapshot overlay post-migration. This overlay image
will have a json:{} backing filename in its image metadata, which
contains a 'backing' key[2].
'qemu-img info' uses the BDRV_O_NO_BACKING flag to open images, which
conflicts with those backing options: With that flag, nobody processes
those options, and thatâs an error. Therefore, you canât run 'qemu-img
info --backing-chain' on that overlay image.
That part of the issue is not fixed in this series, however. Iâll send
a separate RFC series for it, because Iâm honstly not quite certain how
it should be fixed.
[1] Example:
json:{"driver": "qcow2",
"file": {"driver": "file", "filename": "img.qcow2"}}
Will generally be âresolvedâ by bdrv_refresh_filename() to
"img.qcow2"
[2] That it contains a 'backing' key is only natural, because the reason
why bdrv_refresh_filename() decided to generate a json:{} filename
for the image is because it considered the backing file overridden.
Hence it must put the actual backing file options into a 'backing'
object in the json:{} filename.
Hanna Reitz (3):
block/qcow2: Keep auto_backing_file if possible
block/qed: Keep auto_backing_file if possible
iotests/backing-file-invalidation: Add new test
block/qcow2.c | 21 ++-
block/qed.c | 15 +-
.../tests/backing-file-invalidation | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
.../tests/backing-file-invalidation.out | 5 +
4 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/tests/backing-file-invalidation
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/tests/backing-file-invalidation.out
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 14:44 Hanna Reitz [this message]
2022-08-03 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] block/qcow2: Keep auto_backing_file if possible Hanna Reitz
2022-08-03 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] block/qed: " Hanna Reitz
2022-08-03 14:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] iotests/backing-file-invalidation: Add new test Hanna Reitz
2022-09-22 16:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] block: Keep auto_backing_file post-migration Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220803144446.20723-1-hreitz@redhat.com \
--to=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).