qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	integration@gluster.org,
	"Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy" <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>,
	"Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy" <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	sgarzare@redhat.com, "Alberto Faria" <afaria@redhat.com>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Wen Congyang" <wencongyang2@huawei.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Jeff Cody" <codyprime@gmail.com>,
	"Xie Changlong" <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC v4 02/11] numa: call ->ram_block_removed() in ram_block_notifer_remove()
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 18:23:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822222402.176088-3-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822222402.176088-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

When a RAMBlockNotifier is added, ->ram_block_added() is called with all
existing RAMBlocks. There is no equivalent ->ram_block_removed() call
when a RAMBlockNotifier is removed.

The util/vfio-helpers.c code (the sole user of RAMBlockNotifier) is fine
with this asymmetry because it does not rely on RAMBlockNotifier for
cleanup. It walks its internal list of DMA mappings and unmaps them by
itself.

Future users of RAMBlockNotifier may not have an internal data structure
that records added RAMBlocks so they will need ->ram_block_removed()
callbacks.

This patch makes ram_block_notifier_remove() symmetric with respect to
callbacks. Now util/vfio-helpers.c needs to unmap remaining DMA mappings
after ram_block_notifier_remove() has been called. This is necessary
since users like block/nvme.c may create additional DMA mappings that do
not originate from the RAMBlockNotifier.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 hw/core/numa.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 util/vfio-helpers.c |  5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
index 26d8e5f616..31e6fe1caa 100644
--- a/hw/core/numa.c
+++ b/hw/core/numa.c
@@ -822,6 +822,19 @@ static int ram_block_notify_add_single(RAMBlock *rb, void *opaque)
     return 0;
 }
 
+static int ram_block_notify_remove_single(RAMBlock *rb, void *opaque)
+{
+    const ram_addr_t max_size = qemu_ram_get_max_length(rb);
+    const ram_addr_t size = qemu_ram_get_used_length(rb);
+    void *host = qemu_ram_get_host_addr(rb);
+    RAMBlockNotifier *notifier = opaque;
+
+    if (host) {
+        notifier->ram_block_removed(notifier, host, size, max_size);
+    }
+    return 0;
+}
+
 void ram_block_notifier_add(RAMBlockNotifier *n)
 {
     QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.ramblock_notifiers, n, next);
@@ -835,6 +848,10 @@ void ram_block_notifier_add(RAMBlockNotifier *n)
 void ram_block_notifier_remove(RAMBlockNotifier *n)
 {
     QLIST_REMOVE(n, next);
+
+    if (n->ram_block_removed) {
+        qemu_ram_foreach_block(ram_block_notify_remove_single, n);
+    }
 }
 
 void ram_block_notify_add(void *host, size_t size, size_t max_size)
diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
index 5ba01177bf..0d1520caac 100644
--- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
+++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
@@ -847,10 +847,13 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
     if (!s) {
         return;
     }
+
+    ram_block_notifier_remove(&s->ram_notifier);
+
     for (i = 0; i < s->nr_mappings; ++i) {
         qemu_vfio_undo_mapping(s, &s->mappings[i], NULL);
     }
-    ram_block_notifier_remove(&s->ram_notifier);
+
     g_free(s->usable_iova_ranges);
     s->nb_iova_ranges = 0;
     qemu_vfio_reset(s);
-- 
2.37.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-22 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-22 22:23 [RFC v4 00/11] blkio: add libblkio BlockDriver Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 01/11] blkio: add libblkio block driver Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-30  7:30   ` Markus Armbruster
2022-08-30 20:18     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 03/11] block: pass size to bdrv_unregister_buf() Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 04/11] block: use BdrvRequestFlags type for supported flag fields Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 05/11] block: add BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF request flag Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 06/11] block: return errors from bdrv_register_buf() Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 07/11] block: add BlockRAMRegistrar Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:23 ` [RFC v4 08/11] exec/cpu-common: add qemu_ram_get_fd() Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:24 ` [RFC v4 09/11] stubs: add qemu_ram_block_from_host() and qemu_ram_get_fd() Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:24 ` [RFC v4 10/11] blkio: implement BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF optimization Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-22 22:24 ` [RFC v4 11/11] virtio-blk: use BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF optimization hint Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-23  8:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-23 19:22     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-25  7:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-30 20:16         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-02  8:06           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-05 20:50             ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-23 17:31 ` [RFC v4 00/11] blkio: add libblkio BlockDriver Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-23 20:35   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-08-31 19:44   ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220822222402.176088-3-stefanha@redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaria@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=codyprime@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=integration@gluster.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=v.sementsov-og@mail.ru \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).