From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>,
Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Subject: [PATCH v11 12/21] job: detect change of aiocontext within job coroutine
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:20:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826132104.3678958-13-eesposit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826132104.3678958-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We want to make sure access of job->aio_context is always done
under either BQL or job_mutex. The problem is that using
aio_co_enter(job->aiocontext, job->co) in job_start and job_enter_cond
makes the coroutine immediately resume, so we can't hold the job lock.
And caching it is not safe either, as it might change.
job_start is under BQL, so it can freely read job->aiocontext, but
job_enter_cond is not.
We want to avoid reading job->aio_context in job_enter_cond, therefore:
1) use aio_co_wake(), since it doesn't want an aiocontext as argument
but uses job->co->ctx
2) detect possible discrepancy between job->co->ctx and job->aio_context
by checking right after the coroutine resumes back from yielding if
job->aio_context has changed. If so, reschedule the coroutine to the
new context.
Calling bdrv_try_set_aio_context() will issue the following calls
(simplified):
* in terms of bdrv callbacks:
.drained_begin -> .set_aio_context -> .drained_end
* in terms of child_job functions:
child_job_drained_begin -> child_job_set_aio_context -> child_job_drained_end
* in terms of job functions:
job_pause_locked -> job_set_aio_context -> job_resume_locked
We can see that after setting the new aio_context, job_resume_locked
calls again job_enter_cond, which then invokes aio_co_wake(). But
while job->aiocontext has been set in job_set_aio_context,
job->co->ctx has not changed, so the coroutine would be entering in
the wrong aiocontext.
Using aio_co_schedule in job_resume_locked() might seem as a valid
alternative, but the problem is that the bh resuming the coroutine
is not scheduled immediately, and if in the meanwhile another
bdrv_try_set_aio_context() is run (see test_propagate_mirror() in
test-block-iothread.c), we would have the first schedule in the
wrong aiocontext, and the second set of drains won't even manage
to schedule the coroutine, as job->busy would still be true from
the previous job_resume_locked().
The solution is to stick with aio_co_wake() and detect every time
the coroutine resumes back from yielding if job->aio_context
has changed. If so, we can reschedule it to the new context.
Check for the aiocontext change in job_do_yield_locked because:
1) aio_co_reschedule_self requires to be in the running coroutine
2) since child_job_set_aio_context allows changing the aiocontext only
while the job is paused, this is the exact place where the coroutine
resumes, before running JobDriver's code.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
job.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/job.c b/job.c
index e336af0c1c..85ae843f03 100644
--- a/job.c
+++ b/job.c
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ void job_enter_cond_locked(Job *job, bool(*fn)(Job *job))
job->busy = true;
real_job_unlock();
job_unlock();
- aio_co_enter(job->aio_context, job->co);
+ aio_co_wake(job->co);
job_lock();
}
@@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ void job_enter(Job *job)
*/
static void coroutine_fn job_do_yield_locked(Job *job, uint64_t ns)
{
+ AioContext *next_aio_context;
+
real_job_lock();
if (ns != -1) {
timer_mod(&job->sleep_timer, ns);
@@ -626,7 +628,20 @@ static void coroutine_fn job_do_yield_locked(Job *job, uint64_t ns)
qemu_coroutine_yield();
job_lock();
- /* Set by job_enter_cond() before re-entering the coroutine. */
+ next_aio_context = job->aio_context;
+ /*
+ * Coroutine has resumed, but in the meanwhile the job AioContext
+ * might have changed via bdrv_try_set_aio_context(), so we need to move
+ * the coroutine too in the new aiocontext.
+ */
+ while (qemu_get_current_aio_context() != next_aio_context) {
+ job_unlock();
+ aio_co_reschedule_self(next_aio_context);
+ job_lock();
+ next_aio_context = job->aio_context;
+ }
+
+ /* Set by job_enter_cond_locked() before re-entering the coroutine. */
assert(job->busy);
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 13:20 [PATCH v11 00/21] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 01/21] job.c: make job_mutex and job_lock/unlock() public Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 02/21] job.h: categorize fields in struct Job Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 03/21] job.c: API functions not used outside should be static Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 04/21] aio-wait.h: introduce AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 05/21] job.c: add job_lock/unlock while keeping job.h intact Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-15 15:12 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 06/21] job: move and update comments from blockjob.c Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 07/21] blockjob: introduce block_job _locked() APIs Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 08/21] jobs: add job lock in find_* functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 09/21] jobs: use job locks also in the unit tests Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 10/21] block/mirror.c: use of job helpers in drivers Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 12:51 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 11/21] jobs: group together API calls under the same job lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 12:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-09-18 16:51 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 13/21] jobs: protect job.aio_context with BQL and job_mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 13:25 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-09-18 16:54 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 14/21] blockjob.h: categorize fields in struct BlockJob Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 15/21] blockjob: rename notifier callbacks as _locked Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:20 ` [PATCH v11 16/21] blockjob: protect iostatus field in BlockJob struct Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 13:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-26 13:21 ` [PATCH v11 17/21] job.h: categorize JobDriver callbacks that need the AioContext lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 14:05 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-26 13:21 ` [PATCH v11 18/21] job.c: enable job lock/unlock and remove Aiocontext locks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-15 14:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-09-18 17:12 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-22 14:42 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-23 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-26 12:21 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-09-27 21:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-26 13:21 ` [PATCH v11 19/21] block_job_query: remove atomic read Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-08-26 13:21 ` [PATCH v11 20/21] blockjob: remove unused functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 14:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-08-26 13:21 ` [PATCH v11 21/21] job: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-14 14:28 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-09-18 17:22 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-22 14:39 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826132104.3678958-13-eesposit@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).