From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8BDCC38145 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 10:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46618 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWF3o-0003CY-Og for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:47:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWF1M-0000ee-IY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:44:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]:40546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWF17-0005X1-Pc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:44:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id r17so3896919pgr.7 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 03:44:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=adJDRS6AMKloAvz10NEIG932vsL+jMGhzDfJoNsC4Z0=; b=QuT3bmA4RvBeRsXhpSFAtGahPp0e7LiEjC5lxn3cWRNZj5ht83rZOix3GjxQw6whq1 28YZug29Rd++JklEPc4Hhs/PAtEc+BCZRJhyrEUUWyirOV/fctwav28TGzf/VuuU0eKJ aOnZMXnUb30TlyHC9uOSs2YTFO7SogBIhqP3LubTtpaJNxeQ2wyBBjGfM+kcLMnhMwGd jcP88KRe8RxgHld2vbxpHzIp19B+bABVrrb9dWcZv1588W76K3ceaHYNlPfBELxj9qQf mjerGvtZPOP4DvkXUgC6WyA0gr6hat0Le2Snz8/Wk85SaQ3xcCk2qoTYZfFzwU/KPbSk NXKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=adJDRS6AMKloAvz10NEIG932vsL+jMGhzDfJoNsC4Z0=; b=tZez9aCGK10jf0lbALnpHztjVCB9UhCed8YjMe0k5eJAP5T5PHvFBneEIuov90gIle 6qGoXjxSV4bQ6jF9rAVjeYlO5eF9VVU0PgIlHii1I+U9L24ZsF66H9+Njhqr4wbgYkot ER5UbP4Jr56Zf6ycPpQoGazXChEqO+0OSA1dUin7zqxLDGfk8vbqhbBoh/CzqFLnCO6T ZJVce2WX4MNtIv0ocCfzYG0jzmAhL80Jl3hy6HVrcWsSe9rHVx6Og7NB43dhipHgyw6b BYcLIGC0BCGRzzRB0K/o2YwMn0x+xXy7xvAJqTdL3GsZbCMmLJiPrEVYmBb+HMFUp4r0 ZRqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0hOJmjhM+B2D+AF8u0cGu5Ac0MfN4fRLSbeQKlHq1F0jZruQXE VuyhUytEktoR2v6Q8Of1zzricQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4Aa8jBdL117JN/vqIGzVyPciNHu82oVxcUEsJJD/gK32+NRaLtQcWUKXyJkI6kbD9sX0q/Jw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1c2:0:b0:430:710d:4c85 with SMTP id 185-20020a6301c2000000b00430710d4c85mr7316475pgb.12.1662633855385; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunil-laptop ([49.206.11.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17-20020a631751000000b00434e00227a7sm3585314pgx.4.2022.09.08.03.44.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:14:06 +0530 From: Sunil V L To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Xiaojuan Yang , Song Gao , Palmer Dabbelt , Alistair Francis , Bin Meng , Andrew Jones , Anup Patel , Atish Kumar Patra , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Heinrich Schuchardt , Pawel Polawski Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] hw/riscv: virt: Enable booting S-mode firmware from pflash Message-ID: <20220908104406.GA103508@sunil-laptop> References: <20220906090219.412517-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> <20220906104128.zlwzvbbswlzyplkc@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20220906123200.GA237800@sunil-laptop> <20220907071037.tnnewqhi5v2xmiln@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20220908102527.GB88864@sunil-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220908102527.GB88864@sunil-laptop> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::529; envelope-from=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com; helo=mail-pg1-x529.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" > Same thing can be adopted to arm also since both seem to follow the same > logic. But I think that will be a separate patch than this series. I > will run that as a separate RFC patch. Is that fine? Just to be clear, I meant RISC-V fix as separate RFC patch. Not the ARM. Thanks Sunil