From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<kwankhede@nvidia.com>, <avihaih@nvidia.com>, <shayd@nvidia.com>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/common: Do not g_free in vfio_get_iommu_info
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:03:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220914140325.41bd470d.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220914135339.665b90b1.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:53:39 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:02:56 -0700
> Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:10:29PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Its caller vfio_connect_container() assigns a default value
> > > > > > to info->iova_pgsizes, even if vfio_get_iommu_info() fails.
> > > > > > This would result in a "Segmentation fault" error, when the
> > > > > > VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctl errors out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since the caller has g_free already, drop the g_free in its
> > > > > > rollback routine and add a line of comments to highlight it.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's basically two ways to fix this:
> > > > >
> > > > > - return *info in any case, even on error
> > > > > - free *info on error, and make sure that the caller doesn't try to
> > > > > access *info if the function returned !0
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem with the first option is that the caller will access invalid
> > > > > information if it neglects to check the return code, and that might lead
> > > > > to not-that-obvious errors; in the second case, a broken caller would at
> > > > > least fail quickly with a segfault. The current code is easier to fix
> > > > > with the first option.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I'd prefer the second option; but obviously maintainer's choice.
> > > >
> > > > The caller does check rc all the time. So I made a smaller fix
> > > > (the first option). Attaching the git-diff for the second one.
> > > >
> > > > Alex, please let me know which one you prefer. Thanks!
> >
> > > I think we can do better than that, I don't think we need to maintain
> > > the existing grouping, and that FIXME comment is outdated and has
> > > drifted from the relevant line of code. What about:
> >
> > Your patch looks good and clean to me (some nits inline).
> >
> > Would you please send and merge it, replacing mine?
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Setup defaults for container pgsizes and dma_max_mappings if not
> > > + * provided by kernel below.
> > > */
> >
> > Indentation is misaligned at the first line.
>
> Oops, will run through checkpatch.
>
> >
> > > + container->pgsizes = 4096;
> >
> > This might be a separate question/issue: I wonder if we should use
> > "sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)" here instead of 4096.
> >
> > With a kernel using a larger page size, e.g. CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES,
> > the IO page size is likely to be 64K too. If the ioctl fails, this
> > default 4K setup won't work.
>
> Perhaps, but IIRC this solution came about because we originally forgot
> to expose the IOMMU_INFO flag to indicate the pgsize field was valid.
> At the time we only supported 4K systems, so it made sense to provide
> this default, though it is indeed dated.
>
> TBH, I don't really see why we should try to continue if the ioctl
> itself fails, so maybe this should be:
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index ace9562a9ba1..ad188b7649e6 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -2111,29 +2111,31 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group, AddressSpace *as,
> {
> struct vfio_iommu_type1_info *info;
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME: This assumes that a Type1 IOMMU can map any 64-bit
> - * IOVA whatsoever. That's not actually true, but the current
> - * kernel interface doesn't tell us what it can map, and the
> - * existing Type1 IOMMUs generally support any IOVA we're
> - * going to actually try in practice.
> - */
> ret = vfio_get_iommu_info(container, &info);
> + if (ret) {
Clearly untested,
ret = -errno;
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Failed to get VFIO IOMMU info");
> + goto enable_discards_exit:;
> + }
>
> - if (ret || !(info->flags & VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES)) {
> - /* Assume 4k IOVA page size */
> - info->iova_pgsizes = 4096;
> + if (info->flags & VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES) {
> + container->pgsizes = info->iova_pgsizes;
> + } else {
> + container->pgsizes = qemu_real_host_page_size();
> }
> - vfio_host_win_add(container, 0, (hwaddr)-1, info->iova_pgsizes);
> - container->pgsizes = info->iova_pgsizes;
>
> - /* The default in the kernel ("dma_entry_limit") is 65535. */
> - container->dma_max_mappings = 65535;
> - if (!ret) {
> - vfio_get_info_dma_avail(info, &container->dma_max_mappings);
> - vfio_get_iommu_info_migration(container, info);
> + if (!vfio_get_info_dma_avail(info, &container->dma_max_mappings)) {
> + container->dma_max_mappings = 65535;
> }
> + vfio_get_iommu_info_migration(container, info);
> g_free(info);
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME: We should parse VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE
> + * information to get the actual window extent rather than assume
> + * a 64-bit IOVA address space.
> + */
> + vfio_host_win_add(container, 0, (hwaddr)-1, container->pgsizes);
> +
> break;
> }
> case VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-10 0:42 [PATCH] vfio/common: Do not g_free in vfio_get_iommu_info Nicolin Chen
2022-09-12 12:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-12 20:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 18:10 ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-14 18:30 ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-14 19:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 19:53 ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-14 20:03 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2022-09-14 20:16 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220914140325.41bd470d.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).