From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"a.manzanares@samsung.com" <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hw/cxl: type 3 devices can now present volatile or persistent memory
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:32:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221010173242.000032a8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221010154343.00007afd@huawei.com>
> > but i'm not sure of what to do with this info. We have some proof
> > that real hardware works with this no problem, and the only difference
> > is that the EFI/bios/firmware is setting the memory regions as `usable`
> > or `soft reserved`, which would imply the EDK2 is the blocker here
> > regardless of the OS driver status.
> >
> > But I'd seen elsewhere you had gotten some of this working, and I'm
> > failing to get anything working at the moment. If you have any input i
> > would greatly appreciate the help.
> >
> > QEMU config:
> >
> > /opt/qemu-cxl2/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 \
> > -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/cxl.qcow2,format=qcow2,index=0,media=d\
> > -m 2G,slots=4,maxmem=4G \
> > -smp 4 \
> > -machine type=q35,accel=kvm,cxl=on \
> > -enable-kvm \
> > -nographic \
> > -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus=pcie.0,bus_nr=52 \
> > -device cxl-rp,id=rp0,bus=cxl.0,chassis=0,slot=0 \
> > -object memory-backend-file,id=cxl-mem0,mem-path=/tmp/cxl-mem0,size=256M \
> > -object memory-backend-file,id=lsa0,mem-path=/tmp/cxl-lsa0,size=256M \
> > -device cxl-type3,bus=rp0,pmem=true,memdev=cxl-mem0,lsa=lsa0,id=cxl-pmem0 \
> > -M cxl-fmw.0.targets.0=cxl.0,cxl-fmw.0.size=256M
> >
> > I'd seen on the lists that you had seen issues with single-rp setups,
> > but no combination of configuration I've tried (including all the ones
> > in the docs and tests) lead to a successful region creation with
> > `cxl create-region`
>
> Hmm. Let me have a play. I've not run x86 tests for a while so
> perhaps something is missing there.
>
> I'm carrying a patch to override check_last_peer() in
> cxl_port_setup_targets() as that is wrong for some combinations,
> but that doesn't look like it's related to what you are seeing.
I'm not sure if it's relevant, but turned out I'd forgotten I'm carrying 3
patches that aren't upstream (and one is a horrible hack).
Hack: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220819094655.000005ed@huawei.com/
Shouldn't affect a simple case like this...
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220819093133.00006c22@huawei.com/T/#t
(Dan's version)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220815154044.24733-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/T/#t
For writes to work you will currently need two rps (nothing on the second is fine)
as we still haven't resolved if the kernel should support an HDM decoder on
a host bridge with one port. I think it should (Spec allows it), others unconvinced.
Note I haven't shifted over to x86 yet so may still be something different from
arm64.
Jonathan
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > 3) Upstream linux drivers haven't touched ram configurations yet. I
> > > > just configured this with Dan Williams yesterday on IRC. My
> > > > understanding is that it's been worked on but nothing has been
> > > > upstreamed, in part because there are only a very small set of devices
> > > > available to developers at the moment.
> > >
> > > There was an offer of similar volatile memory QEMU emulation in the
> > > session on QEMU CXL at Linux Plumbers. That will look something like you have
> > > here and maybe reflects that someone has hardware as well...
> > >
> >
> > I saw that, and I figured I'd start the conversation by pushing
> > something :].
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-10 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-06 0:01 [PATCH RFC] hw/cxl: type 3 devices can now present volatile or persistent memory Gourry
2022-10-06 8:45 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-06 8:50 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-06 15:52 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-06 16:42 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-06 17:29 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-07 14:50 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-10 15:18 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-10 15:25 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-11 1:23 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-11 17:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-10-11 17:22 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-11 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-10 14:43 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-10 15:20 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-10 16:26 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-10-10 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2022-10-10 17:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-10-07 18:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-10-07 18:46 ` Gregory Price
2022-10-07 19:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-10-07 19:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221010173242.000032a8@huawei.com \
--to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).