From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: type mismatch in SSDT
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:15:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027101531-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027155253.0d81989c@fedora>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:52:53PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 01:59:22 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Just noticed this when disassembling:
> >
> > Parsing completed
> > ACPI Warning: NsLookup: Type mismatch on ODAT (RegionField), searching for (Buffer) (20210604/nsaccess-760)
> > Disassembly completed
> > ASL Output: /tmp/old-asl2/tests/data/acpi/virt/SSDT.memhp.dsl - 14945 bytes
> >
> > Did not look into this yet but it seems new.
> It was there practically 'forever'.
>
> ODAT should be treated as Buffer according to implicit Field/data conversion rules,
> that's probably the reason why it works. So warning looks a bit bogus to me.
>
> however:
> DefCreateByteField := CreateByteFieldOp SourceBuff ByteIndex NameString
> SourceBuff := TermArg => Buffer
> TermArg := ExpressionOpcode | DataObject | ArgObj | LocalObj
>
> and none of that explicitly leads to
>
> TermObj := Object | StatementOpcode | ExpressionOpcode
> Object := NameSpaceModifierObj | NamedObj
>
> So if we are to be as pedantic as IASL, we need to supply
> field to CreateByteField not by name but via one of TermArg.
> We could copy/assign whole buffer to a LocalObj
> or summarily use ExpressionOpcode => ToBuffer() // this one has a bit controversial definition in 6.4 spec
> or to avoid any copying add 'useless' DerefOf(RefOf())
> wrapper around name to make argument of ExpressionOpcode kind.
>
> following should silence warning.
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> index 31e46df0bd..7488007540 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev,
> /* If RLEN >= Integer size, just use CreateField() operator */
> aml_append(method, aml_store(aml_shiftleft(dsm_out_buf_size, aml_int(3)),
> dsm_out_buf_size));
> - aml_append(method, aml_create_field(aml_name(NVDIMM_DSM_OUT_BUF),
> + aml_append(method, aml_create_field(aml_derefof(aml_refof(aml_name(NVDIMM_DSM_OUT_BUF))),
> aml_int(0), dsm_out_buf_size, "OBUF"));
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_name("OBUF")));
Thanks! Let's try to raise this with ACPI committee?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 5:59 type mismatch in SSDT Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-27 13:52 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-10-27 14:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-10-31 10:46 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221027101531-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).