qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: huangy81@chinatelecom.cn
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
	Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost-user: Refactor vhost acked features saving
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:28:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221029042532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f537f6a484cfdac236fd6307f796660ae562226.1666977755.git.huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 01:25:44AM +0800, huangy81@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
> From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
> 
> Abstract vhost acked features saving into
> vhost_user_save_acked_features, export it as util function.
>

Thanks for the patch!

This commit log makes it sound like it's just a refactoring
while it's actually a behaviour change.
This log needs to include analysis of why is saving only if features != 0
safe.

Could you include that pls?

Thanks!
 
> Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
>  include/net/vhost-user.h |  2 ++
>  net/vhost-user.c         | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/vhost-user.h b/include/net/vhost-user.h
> index 5bcd8a6..00d4661 100644
> --- a/include/net/vhost-user.h
> +++ b/include/net/vhost-user.h
> @@ -14,5 +14,7 @@
>  struct vhost_net;
>  struct vhost_net *vhost_user_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc);
>  uint64_t vhost_user_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc);
> +void vhost_user_save_acked_features(NetClientState *nc,
> +                                    bool cleanup);
>  
>  #endif /* VHOST_USER_H */
> diff --git a/net/vhost-user.c b/net/vhost-user.c
> index b1a0247..c512cc9 100644
> --- a/net/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/net/vhost-user.c
> @@ -45,24 +45,31 @@ uint64_t vhost_user_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc)
>      return s->acked_features;
>  }
>  
> -static void vhost_user_stop(int queues, NetClientState *ncs[])
> +void vhost_user_save_acked_features(NetClientState *nc, bool cleanup)
>  {
>      NetVhostUserState *s;
> +
> +    s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, nc);
> +    if (s->vhost_net) {
> +        uint64_t features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
> +        if (features) {
> +            s->acked_features = features;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (cleanup) {
> +            vhost_net_cleanup(s->vhost_net);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_user_stop(int queues, NetClientState *ncs[])
> +{
>      int i;
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>          assert(ncs[i]->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_USER);
>  
> -        s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, ncs[i]);
> -
> -        if (s->vhost_net) {
> -            /* save acked features */
> -            uint64_t features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
> -            if (features) {
> -                s->acked_features = features;
> -            }
> -            vhost_net_cleanup(s->vhost_net);
> -        }
> +        vhost_user_save_acked_features(ncs[i], true);
>      }
>  }
>  
> @@ -251,11 +258,7 @@ static void chr_closed_bh(void *opaque)
>      s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, ncs[0]);
>  
>      for (i = queues -1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -        s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, ncs[i]);
> -
> -        if (s->vhost_net) {
> -            s->acked_features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
> -        }
> +        vhost_user_save_acked_features(ncs[i], false);


So this won't do anything if acked features is 0.
When does this have any effect? How about if guest
acked some features, and then reset the device.
Don't we want to reset the features in this case too?


>      }
>  
>      qmp_set_link(name, false, &err);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1



  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-29  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-28 17:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix the virtio features negotiation flaw huangy81
2022-10-28 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost-user: Refactor vhost acked features saving huangy81
2022-10-29  8:28   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-10-30  5:14     ` Hyman Huang
2022-10-30  7:51       ` Hyman Huang
2022-10-28 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost-net: Fix the virtio features negotiation flaw huangy81

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221029042532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=huangy81@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=tugy@chinatelecom.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).