From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Hyman <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
"Guoyi Tu" <tugy@chinatelecom.cn>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost-net: Fix the virtio features negotiation flaw
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:48:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221114104008-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc4c24eb-239b-8e6e-a534-64effe845ca5@chinatelecom.cn>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:35:30PM +0800, Hyman wrote:
>
>
> 在 2022/11/11 3:17, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 09:52:39PM +0800, huangy81@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
> > > From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
> > >
> > > Save the acked_features once it be configured by guest
> > > virtio driver so it can't miss any features.
> > >
> > > Note that this patch also change the features saving logic
> > > in chr_closed_bh, which originally backup features no matter
> > > whether the features are 0 or not, but now do it only if
> > > features aren't 0.
> > >
> > > As to reset acked_features to 0 if needed, Qemu always
> > > keeping the backup acked_features up-to-date, and save the
> > > acked_features after virtio_net_set_features in advance,
> > > including reset acked_features to 0, so the behavior is
> > > also covered.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn>
> > > ---
> > > hw/net/vhost_net.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 5 +++++
> > > include/net/vhost_net.h | 2 ++
> > > net/vhost-user.c | 6 +-----
> > > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > > index d28f8b9..2bffc27 100644
> > > --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > > +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > > @@ -141,6 +141,15 @@ uint64_t vhost_net_get_acked_features(VHostNetState *net)
> > > return net->dev.acked_features;
> > > }
> > > +void vhost_net_save_acked_features(NetClientState *nc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (nc->info->type != NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_USER) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vhost_user_save_acked_features(nc, false);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int vhost_net_get_fd(NetClientState *backend)
> > > {
> > > switch (backend->info->type) {
> > > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > index e9f696b..5f8f788 100644
> > > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > @@ -924,6 +924,11 @@ static void virtio_net_set_features(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t features)
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > vhost_net_ack_features(get_vhost_net(nc->peer), features);
> > > + /*
> > > + * keep acked_features in NetVhostUserState up-to-date so it
> > > + * can't miss any features configured by guest virtio driver.
> > > + */
> > > + vhost_net_save_acked_features(nc->peer);
> > > }
> > > if (virtio_has_feature(features, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN)) {
> >
> > So when do you want to ack features but *not* save them?
> When openvswitch restart and reconnect and Qemu start the vhost_dev,
> acked_features in vhost_dev Qemu need to be initialized and the initialized
> value be fetched from acked_features int NetVhostUserState.
> At this time, acked_features may not be up-to-date but we want it.
> >
> > Is the effect of this patch, fundamentally, that guest features
> > from virtio are always copied to vhost-user?
> > Do we even need an extra copy in vhost user then?
> >
> I'm trying to explain this from my view, please point out the mistake if i
> failed. :)
>
> When socket used by vhost-user device disconnectted from openvswitch,
> Qemu will stop the vhost-user and clean up the whole struct of
> vhost_dev(include vm's memory region and acked_features), once socket is
> reconnected from openvswitch, Qemu will collect vm's memory region
> dynamically but as to acked_features, IMHO, Qemu can not fetch it from guest
> features of virtio-net, because acked_features are kind of different from
> guest features(bit 30 is different at least),so Qemu need an extra copy.
Well we already have a list of valid frontend features in
user_feature_bits.
> >
> > all this came in with:
> >
> > commit a463215b087c41d7ca94e51aa347cde523831873
> > Author: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon Jun 6 18:45:05 2016 +0200
> >
> > vhost-net: save & restore vhost-user acked features
> >
> > Marc-André do you remember why we have a copy of features in vhost-user
> > and not just reuse the features from virtio?
> >
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/vhost_net.h b/include/net/vhost_net.h
> > > index 387e913..3a5579b 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/vhost_net.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/vhost_net.h
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ int vhost_set_vring_enable(NetClientState * nc, int enable);
> > > uint64_t vhost_net_get_acked_features(VHostNetState *net);
> > > +void vhost_net_save_acked_features(NetClientState *nc);
> > > +
> > > int vhost_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_net *net, uint16_t mtu);
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/net/vhost-user.c b/net/vhost-user.c
> > > index 74f349c..c512cc9 100644
> > > --- a/net/vhost-user.c
> > > +++ b/net/vhost-user.c
> > > @@ -258,11 +258,7 @@ static void chr_closed_bh(void *opaque)
> > > s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, ncs[0]);
> > > for (i = queues -1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > > - s = DO_UPCAST(NetVhostUserState, nc, ncs[i]);
> > > -
> > > - if (s->vhost_net) {
> > > - s->acked_features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
> > > - }
> > > + vhost_user_save_acked_features(ncs[i], false);
> > > }
> > > qmp_set_link(name, false, &err);
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-30 13:52 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix the virtio features negotiation flaw huangy81
2022-10-30 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] vhost-user: Refactor vhost acked features saving huangy81
2022-11-10 18:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-11 12:24 ` Hyman Huang
2022-10-30 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost-net: Fix the virtio features negotiation flaw huangy81
2022-11-10 19:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-11 18:37 ` Hyman
2022-11-11 18:49 ` Hyman
2022-11-10 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-14 15:35 ` Hyman
2022-11-14 15:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-10 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-11 6:46 ` Hyman Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221114104008-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=huangy81@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=tugy@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).