qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/20] block-gen: assert that {bdrv/blk}_co_flush is always called with graph rdlock taken
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221116134850.3051419-16-eesposit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116134850.3051419-1-eesposit@redhat.com>

This function, in addition to be called by a generated_co_wrapper,
is also called by the blk_* API.
The strategy is to always take the lock at the function called
when the coroutine is created, to avoid recursive locking.

Protecting bdrv_co_flush() implies that the following BlockDriver
callbacks always called with graph rdlock taken:
- bdrv_co_flush
- bdrv_co_flush_to_os
- bdrv_co_flush_to_disk

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
 block/block-backend.c            | 3 ++-
 block/io.c                       | 1 +
 include/block/block_int-common.h | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
index 083ed6009e..d660772375 100644
--- a/block/block-backend.c
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
@@ -1759,8 +1759,9 @@ int coroutine_fn blk_co_pdiscard(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t offset,
 /* To be called between exactly one pair of blk_inc/dec_in_flight() */
 static int coroutine_fn blk_co_do_flush(BlockBackend *blk)
 {
-    blk_wait_while_drained(blk);
     IO_CODE();
+    blk_wait_while_drained(blk);
+    GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD();
 
     if (!blk_is_available(blk)) {
         return -ENOMEDIUM;
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index cfc201ef91..0bf3919939 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2757,6 +2757,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
     int ret = 0;
     IO_CODE();
 
+    assert_bdrv_graph_readable();
     bdrv_inc_in_flight(bs);
 
     if (!bdrv_is_inserted(bs) || bdrv_is_read_only(bs) ||
diff --git a/include/block/block_int-common.h b/include/block/block_int-common.h
index 64c5bb64de..bab0521943 100644
--- a/include/block/block_int-common.h
+++ b/include/block/block_int-common.h
@@ -661,6 +661,8 @@ struct BlockDriver {
      * Flushes all data for all layers by calling bdrv_co_flush for underlying
      * layers, if needed. This function is needed for deterministic
      * synchronization of the flush finishing callback.
+     *
+     * Called with graph rdlock taken.
      */
     int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_flush)(BlockDriverState *bs);
 
@@ -671,6 +673,8 @@ struct BlockDriver {
     /*
      * Flushes all data that was already written to the OS all the way down to
      * the disk (for example file-posix.c calls fsync()).
+     *
+     * Called with graph rdlock taken.
      */
     int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_flush_to_disk)(BlockDriverState *bs);
 
@@ -678,6 +682,8 @@ struct BlockDriver {
      * Flushes all internal caches to the OS. The data may still sit in a
      * writeback cache of the host OS, but it will survive a crash of the qemu
      * process.
+     *
+     * Called with graph rdlock held.
      */
     int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_flush_to_os)(BlockDriverState *bs);
 
-- 
2.31.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 13:48 [PATCH 00/20] Protect the block layer with a rwlock: part 1 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 01/20] block: introduce a lock to protect graph operations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 02/20] graph-lock: introduce BdrvGraphRWlock structure Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 03/20] async: register/unregister aiocontext in graph lock list Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 04/20] block.c: wrlock in bdrv_replace_child_noperm Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 05/20] block: remove unnecessary assert_bdrv_graph_writable() Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 06/20] block: assert that graph read and writes are performed correctly Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 07/20] graph-lock: implement WITH_GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD and GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD macros Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 08/20] block-coroutine-wrapper.py: take the graph rdlock in bdrv_* functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 09/20] block-backend: introduce new generated_co_wrapper_blk annotation Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 10/20] block-gen: assert that {bdrv/blk}_co_truncate is always called with graph rdlock taken Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 11/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_{check/invalidate_cache} are " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 12/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_pwrite is " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 13/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_pwrite_{zeros/sync} " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 14/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_pread " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 16/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_{read/write}v_vmstate are " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 17/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_pdiscard is " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 18/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_common_block_status_above " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 19/20] block-gen: assert that bdrv_co_ioctl " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 13:48 ` [PATCH 20/20] block-gen: assert that nbd_co_do_establish_connection " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 15:02 ` [PATCH 00/20] Protect the block layer with a rwlock: part 1 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221116134850.3051419-16-eesposit@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).