From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
<qemu-riscv@nongnu.org>, <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
<mtosatti@redhat.com>, <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
<philmd@linaro.org>, <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
<jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, <aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com>,
<danielhb413@gmail.com>, <clg@kaod.org>,
<david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<alistair.francis@wdc.com>, <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
<pasic@linux.ibm.com>, <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
<richard.henderson@linaro.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
<iii@linux.ibm.com>, <thuth@redhat.com>, <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
<likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: kvm: disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY if "pmu" is disabled
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:03:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221121120311.2731a912@bahia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221119122901.2469-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 04:29:00 -0800
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> wrote:
> The "perf stat" at the VM side still works even we set "-cpu host,-pmu" in
> the QEMU command line. That is, neither "-cpu host,-pmu" nor "-cpu EPYC"
> could disable the pmu virtualization in an AMD environment.
>
> We still see below at VM kernel side ...
>
> [ 0.510611] Performance Events: Fam17h+ core perfctr, AMD PMU driver.
>
> ... although we expect something like below.
>
> [ 0.596381] Performance Events: PMU not available due to virtualization, using software events only.
> [ 0.600972] NMI watchdog: Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled
>
> This is because the AMD pmu (v1) does not rely on cpuid to decide if the
> pmu virtualization is supported.
>
> We disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY if the 'pmu' is disabled in the vcpu
> properties.
>
> Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> ---
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index 8fec0bc5b5..0b1226ff7f 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int has_triple_fault_event;
>
> static bool has_msr_mcg_ext_ctl;
>
> +static int has_pmu_cap;
> +
> static struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid_cache;
> static struct kvm_cpuid2 *hv_cpuid_cache;
> static struct kvm_msr_list *kvm_feature_msrs;
> @@ -1725,6 +1727,19 @@ static void kvm_init_nested_state(CPUX86State *env)
>
> void kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> {
> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (has_pmu_cap && !cpu->enable_pmu) {
> + ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
> + KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
It doesn't seem conceptually correct to configure VM level stuff out of
a vCPU property, which could theoretically be different for each vCPU,
even if this isn't the case with the current code base.
Maybe consider controlling PMU with a machine property and this
could be done in kvm_arch_init() like other VM level stuff ?
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + error_report("kvm: Failed to disable pmu cap: %s",
> + strerror(-ret));
> + }
> +
> + has_pmu_cap = 0;
> + }
> }
>
> int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> @@ -2517,6 +2532,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> }
> }
>
> + has_pmu_cap = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY);
> +
> ret = kvm_get_supported_msrs(s);
> if (ret < 0) {
> return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-19 12:28 [PATCH 0/3] kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs Dongli Zhang
2022-11-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm: introduce a helper before creating the 1st vcpu Dongli Zhang
2022-11-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386: kvm: disable KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY if "pmu" is disabled Dongli Zhang
2022-11-21 11:03 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2022-11-21 14:23 ` Liang Yan
2022-11-21 21:11 ` Dongli Zhang
2023-11-13 16:39 ` Denis V. Lunev
2022-11-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] target/i386/kvm: get and put AMD pmu registers Dongli Zhang
2022-11-21 14:28 ` Liang Yan
2022-11-21 21:33 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-11-21 6:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs Like Xu
2022-11-21 7:38 ` Dongli Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221121120311.2731a912@bahia \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).