From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, slp@redhat.com,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 05:53:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221124055230-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877czkbtbs.fsf@linaro.org>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the
> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a
> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but
> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration
> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code.
> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded
> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally
> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up
> >> >> functions.
> >> >>
> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as
> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the
> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked
> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your
> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ...
> >>
> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is
> >> something different about the CI.
> >
> >
> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2
> >
> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then
> > clang-system manually.
>
> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I
> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem
> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I
> think that is a limitation of the test harness.
>
> Will keep looking.
Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there?
> >
> >> >
> >> >> Alex Bennée (2):
> >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables
> >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start
> >> >>
> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Bennée
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 15:21 [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes Alex Bennée
2022-11-23 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables Alex Bennée
2022-11-23 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start Alex Bennée
2022-11-23 15:26 ` [PATCH for 7.2-rc3 v1 0/2] virtio fixes Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 16:03 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-23 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-24 10:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-24 13:11 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-24 22:24 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-25 12:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25 14:51 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-25 15:14 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221124055230-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).