From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: david@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] target/s390x: Remove TLB_NOTDIRTY workarounds
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:18:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230109201856.3916639-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109201856.3916639-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
When this code was written, it was using tlb_vaddr_to_host,
which does not handle TLB_DIRTY. Since then, it has been
converted to probe_access_flags, which does.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 74 +++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
index 59237fe7de..f7dc710814 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
@@ -122,11 +122,7 @@ typedef struct S390Access {
* If we can't access the host page directly, we'll have to do I/O access
* via ld/st helpers. These are internal details, so we store the
* mmu idx to do the access here instead of passing it around in the
- * helpers. Maybe, one day we can get rid of ld/st access - once we can
- * handle TLB_NOTDIRTY differently. We don't expect these special accesses
- * to trigger exceptions - only if we would have TLB_NOTDIRTY on LAP
- * pages, we might trigger a new MMU translation - very unlikely that
- * the mapping changes in between and we would trigger a fault.
+ * helpers.
*/
int mmu_idx;
} S390Access;
@@ -224,28 +220,14 @@ static void do_access_memset(CPUS390XState *env, vaddr vaddr, char *haddr,
uintptr_t ra)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- g_assert(haddr);
memset(haddr, byte, size);
#else
- MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
- int i;
-
if (likely(haddr)) {
memset(haddr, byte, size);
} else {
- /*
- * Do a single access and test if we can then get access to the
- * page. This is especially relevant to speed up TLB_NOTDIRTY.
- */
- g_assert(size > 0);
- cpu_stb_mmu(env, vaddr, byte, oi, ra);
- haddr = tlb_vaddr_to_host(env, vaddr, MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx);
- if (likely(haddr)) {
- memset(haddr + 1, byte, size - 1);
- } else {
- for (i = 1; i < size; i++) {
- cpu_stb_mmu(env, vaddr + i, byte, oi, ra);
- }
+ MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
+ for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+ cpu_stb_mmu(env, vaddr + i, byte, oi, ra);
}
}
#endif
@@ -265,25 +247,18 @@ static void access_memset(CPUS390XState *env, S390Access *desta,
}
static uint8_t do_access_get_byte(CPUS390XState *env, vaddr vaddr,
- void **haddr, int offset,
+ void *haddr, int offset,
int mmu_idx, uintptr_t ra)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- return ldub_p(*haddr + offset);
+ return ldub_p(haddr + offset);
#else
- MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
- uint8_t byte;
-
- if (likely(*haddr)) {
- return ldub_p(*haddr + offset);
+ if (likely(haddr)) {
+ return ldub_p(haddr + offset);
+ } else {
+ MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
+ return cpu_ldb_mmu(env, vaddr + offset, oi, ra);
}
- /*
- * Do a single access and test if we can then get access to the
- * page. This is especially relevant to speed up TLB_NOTDIRTY.
- */
- byte = cpu_ldb_mmu(env, vaddr + offset, oi, ra);
- *haddr = tlb_vaddr_to_host(env, vaddr, MMU_DATA_LOAD, mmu_idx);
- return byte;
#endif
}
@@ -291,32 +266,27 @@ static uint8_t access_get_byte(CPUS390XState *env, S390Access *access,
int offset, uintptr_t ra)
{
if (offset < access->size1) {
- return do_access_get_byte(env, access->vaddr1, &access->haddr1,
+ return do_access_get_byte(env, access->vaddr1, access->haddr1,
offset, access->mmu_idx, ra);
}
- return do_access_get_byte(env, access->vaddr2, &access->haddr2,
+ return do_access_get_byte(env, access->vaddr2, access->haddr2,
offset - access->size1, access->mmu_idx, ra);
}
-static void do_access_set_byte(CPUS390XState *env, vaddr vaddr, void **haddr,
+static void do_access_set_byte(CPUS390XState *env, vaddr vaddr, void *haddr,
int offset, uint8_t byte, int mmu_idx,
uintptr_t ra)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- stb_p(*haddr + offset, byte);
+ stb_p(haddr + offset, byte);
#else
- MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
- if (likely(*haddr)) {
- stb_p(*haddr + offset, byte);
- return;
+ if (likely(haddr)) {
+ stb_p(haddr + offset, byte);
+ } else {
+ MemOpIdx oi = make_memop_idx(MO_UB, mmu_idx);
+ cpu_stb_mmu(env, vaddr + offset, byte, oi, ra);
}
- /*
- * Do a single access and test if we can then get access to the
- * page. This is especially relevant to speed up TLB_NOTDIRTY.
- */
- cpu_stb_mmu(env, vaddr + offset, byte, oi, ra);
- *haddr = tlb_vaddr_to_host(env, vaddr, MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx);
#endif
}
@@ -324,10 +294,10 @@ static void access_set_byte(CPUS390XState *env, S390Access *access,
int offset, uint8_t byte, uintptr_t ra)
{
if (offset < access->size1) {
- do_access_set_byte(env, access->vaddr1, &access->haddr1, offset, byte,
+ do_access_set_byte(env, access->vaddr1, access->haddr1, offset, byte,
access->mmu_idx, ra);
} else {
- do_access_set_byte(env, access->vaddr2, &access->haddr2,
+ do_access_set_byte(env, access->vaddr2, access->haddr2,
offset - access->size1, byte, access->mmu_idx, ra);
}
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 20:18 [PATCH 0/7] target/s390x: mem_helper.c cleanups Richard Henderson
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] target/s390x: Fix s390_probe_access for user-only Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-15 15:30 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 14:29 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] target/s390x: Pass S390Access pointer into access_prepare Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] target/s390x: Use void* for haddr in S390Access Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] target/s390x: Tidy access_prepare_nf Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-09 20:18 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2023-01-11 10:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] target/s390x: Remove TLB_NOTDIRTY workarounds David Hildenbrand
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] target/s390x: Inline do_access_{get,set}_byte Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-09 20:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] target/s390x: Hoist some computation in access_memmove Richard Henderson
2023-01-11 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 17:53 ` [PATCH 0/7] target/s390x: mem_helper.c cleanups Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230109201856.3916639-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).