From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@aol.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] xen/pt: reserve PCI slot 2 for Intel igd-passthru
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 03:16:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230110030331-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a09d2427397621eaecee4c46b33507a99cc5f161.1673334040.git.brchuckz@aol.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:08:34AM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> Intel specifies that the Intel IGD must occupy slot 2 on the PCI bus,
> as noted in docs/igd-assign.txt in the Qemu source code.
>
> Currently, when the xl toolstack is used to configure a Xen HVM guest with
> Intel IGD passthrough to the guest with the Qemu upstream device model,
> a Qemu emulated PCI device will occupy slot 2 and the Intel IGD will occupy
> a different slot. This problem often prevents the guest from booting.
>
> The only available workaround is not good: Configure Xen HVM guests to use
> the old and no longer maintained Qemu traditional device model available
> from xenbits.xen.org which does reserve slot 2 for the Intel IGD.
>
> To implement this feature in the Qemu upstream device model for Xen HVM
> guests, introduce the following new functions, types, and macros:
>
> * XEN_PT_DEVICE_CLASS declaration, based on the existing TYPE_XEN_PT_DEVICE
> * XEN_PT_DEVICE_GET_CLASS macro helper function for XEN_PT_DEVICE_CLASS
> * typedef XenPTQdevRealize function pointer
> * XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK, the value of slot_reserved_mask to reserve slot 2
> * xen_igd_reserve_slot and xen_igd_clear_slot functions
>
> The new xen_igd_reserve_slot function uses the existing slot_reserved_mask
> member of PCIBus to reserve PCI slot 2 for Xen HVM guests configured using
> the xl toolstack with the gfx_passthru option enabled, which sets the
> igd-passthru=on option to Qemu for the Xen HVM machine type.
>
> The new xen_igd_reserve_slot function also needs to be implemented in
> hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c to prevent FTBFS during the link stage for the case
> when Qemu is configured with --enable-xen and --disable-xen-pci-passthrough,
> in which case it does nothing.
>
> The new xen_igd_clear_slot function overrides qdev->realize of the parent
> PCI device class to enable the Intel IGD to occupy slot 2 on the PCI bus
> since slot 2 was reserved by xen_igd_reserve_slot when the PCI bus was
> created in hw/i386/pc_piix.c for the case when igd-passthru=on.
>
> Move the call to xen_host_pci_device_get, and the associated error
> handling, from xen_pt_realize to the new xen_igd_clear_slot function to
> initialize the device class and vendor values which enables the checks for
> the Intel IGD to succeed. The verification that the host device is an
> Intel IGD to be passed through is done by checking the domain, bus, slot,
> and function values as well as by checking that gfx_passthru is enabled,
> the device class is VGA, and the device vendor in Intel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@aol.com>
> ---
> Notes that might be helpful to reviewers of patched code in hw/xen:
>
> The new functions and types are based on recommendations from Qemu docs:
> https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/devel/qom.html
>
> Notes that might be helpful to reviewers of patched code in hw/i386:
>
> The small patch to hw/i386/pc_piix.c is protected by CONFIG_XEN so it does
> not affect builds that do not have CONFIG_XEN defined.
>
> xen_igd_gfx_pt_enabled() in the patched hw/i386/pc_piix.c file is an
> existing function that is only true when Qemu is built with
> xen-pci-passthrough enabled and the administrator has configured the Xen
> HVM guest with Qemu's igd-passthru=on option.
>
> v2: Remove From: <email address> tag at top of commit message
>
> v3: Changed the test for the Intel IGD in xen_igd_clear_slot:
>
> if (is_igd_vga_passthrough(&s->real_device) &&
> (s->real_device.vendor_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)) {
>
> is changed to
>
> if (xen_igd_gfx_pt_enabled() && (s->hostaddr.slot == 2)
> && (s->hostaddr.function == 0)) {
>
> I hoped that I could use the test in v2, since it matches the
> other tests for the Intel IGD in Qemu and Xen, but those tests
> do not work because the necessary data structures are not set with
> their values yet. So instead use the test that the administrator
> has enabled gfx_passthru and the device address on the host is
> 02.0. This test does detect the Intel IGD correctly.
>
> v4: Use brchuckz@aol.com instead of brchuckz@netscape.net for the author's
> email address to match the address used by the same author in commits
> be9c61da and c0e86b76
>
> Change variable for XEN_PT_DEVICE_CLASS: xptc changed to xpdc
>
> v5: The patch of xen_pt.c was re-worked to allow a more consistent test
> for the Intel IGD that uses the same criteria as in other places.
> This involved moving the call to xen_host_pci_device_get from
> xen_pt_realize to xen_igd_clear_slot and updating the checks for the
> Intel IGD in xen_igd_clear_slot:
>
> if (xen_igd_gfx_pt_enabled() && (s->hostaddr.slot == 2)
> && (s->hostaddr.function == 0)) {
>
> is changed to
>
> if (is_igd_vga_passthrough(&s->real_device) &&
> s->real_device.domain == 0 && s->real_device.bus == 0 &&
> s->real_device.dev == 2 && s->real_device.func == 0 &&
> s->real_device.vendor_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL) {
>
> Added an explanation for the move of xen_host_pci_device_get from
> xen_pt_realize to xen_igd_clear_slot to the commit message.
>
> Rebase.
>
> v6: Fix logging by removing these lines from the move from xen_pt_realize
> to xen_igd_clear_slot that was done in v5:
>
> XEN_PT_LOG(d, "Assigning real physical device %02x:%02x.%d"
> " to devfn 0x%x\n",
> s->hostaddr.bus, s->hostaddr.slot, s->hostaddr.function,
> s->dev.devfn);
>
> This log needs to be in xen_pt_realize because s->dev.devfn is not
> set yet in xen_igd_clear_slot.
>
> v7: The v7 that was posted to the mailing list was incorrect. v8 is what
> v7 was intended to be.
>
> v8: Inhibit out of context log message and needless processing by
> adding 2 lines at the top of the new xen_igd_clear_slot function:
>
> if (!(pci_bus->slot_reserved_mask & XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK))
> return;
>
> Rebase. This removed an unnecessary header file from xen_pt.h
>
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 3 +++
> hw/xen/xen_pt.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> hw/xen/xen_pt.h | 16 +++++++++++++++
> hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> index b48047f50c..bc5efa4f59 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,9 @@ static void pc_xen_hvm_init(MachineState *machine)
> }
>
> pc_xen_hvm_init_pci(machine);
> + if (xen_igd_gfx_pt_enabled()) {
> + xen_igd_reserve_slot(pcms->bus);
> + }
> pci_create_simple(pcms->bus, -1, "xen-platform");
> }
> #endif
I would even maybe go further and move the whole logic into
xen_igd_reserve_slot. And I would even just name it
xen_hvm_init_reserved_slots without worrying about the what
or why at the pc level. At this point it will be up to Xen maintainers.
> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_pt.c b/hw/xen/xen_pt.c
> index 0ec7e52183..eff38155ef 100644
> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt.c
> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt.c
> @@ -780,15 +780,6 @@ static void xen_pt_realize(PCIDevice *d, Error **errp)
> s->hostaddr.bus, s->hostaddr.slot, s->hostaddr.function,
> s->dev.devfn);
>
> - xen_host_pci_device_get(&s->real_device,
> - s->hostaddr.domain, s->hostaddr.bus,
> - s->hostaddr.slot, s->hostaddr.function,
> - errp);
> - if (*errp) {
> - error_append_hint(errp, "Failed to \"open\" the real pci device");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> s->is_virtfn = s->real_device.is_virtfn;
> if (s->is_virtfn) {
> XEN_PT_LOG(d, "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d is a SR-IOV Virtual Function\n",
> @@ -950,11 +941,50 @@ static void xen_pci_passthrough_instance_init(Object *obj)
> PCI_DEVICE(obj)->cap_present |= QEMU_PCI_CAP_EXPRESS;
> }
>
> +void xen_igd_reserve_slot(PCIBus *pci_bus)
> +{
> + XEN_PT_LOG(0, "Reserving PCI slot 2 for IGD\n");
> + pci_bus->slot_reserved_mask |= XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK;
> +}
> +
> +static void xen_igd_clear_slot(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + ERRP_GUARD();
> + PCIDevice *pci_dev = (PCIDevice *)qdev;
> + XenPCIPassthroughState *s = XEN_PT_DEVICE(pci_dev);
> + XenPTDeviceClass *xpdc = XEN_PT_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(s);
> + PCIBus *pci_bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev);
> +
> + if (!(pci_bus->slot_reserved_mask & XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK))
> + return;
> +
> + xen_host_pci_device_get(&s->real_device,
> + s->hostaddr.domain, s->hostaddr.bus,
> + s->hostaddr.slot, s->hostaddr.function,
> + errp);
> + if (*errp) {
> + error_append_hint(errp, "Failed to \"open\" the real pci device");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_igd_vga_passthrough(&s->real_device) &&
> + s->real_device.domain == 0 && s->real_device.bus == 0 &&
> + s->real_device.dev == 2 && s->real_device.func == 0 &&
> + s->real_device.vendor_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL) {
how about macros for these?
#define XEN_PCI_IGD_DOMAIN 0
#define XEN_PCI_IGD_BUS 0
#define XEN_PCI_IGD_DEV 2
#define XEN_PCI_IGD_FN 0
> + pci_bus->slot_reserved_mask &= ~XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK;
If you are going to do this, you should set it back
either after pci_qdev_realize or in unrealize,
for symmetry.
> + XEN_PT_LOG(pci_dev, "Intel IGD found, using slot 2\n");
> + }
> + xpdc->pci_qdev_realize(qdev, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void xen_pci_passthrough_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>
> + XenPTDeviceClass *xpdc = XEN_PT_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + xpdc->pci_qdev_realize = dc->realize;
> + dc->realize = xen_igd_clear_slot;
> k->realize = xen_pt_realize;
> k->exit = xen_pt_unregister_device;
> k->config_read = xen_pt_pci_read_config;
> @@ -977,6 +1007,7 @@ static const TypeInfo xen_pci_passthrough_info = {
> .instance_size = sizeof(XenPCIPassthroughState),
> .instance_finalize = xen_pci_passthrough_finalize,
> .class_init = xen_pci_passthrough_class_init,
> + .class_size = sizeof(XenPTDeviceClass),
> .instance_init = xen_pci_passthrough_instance_init,
> .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
> { INTERFACE_CONVENTIONAL_PCI_DEVICE },
> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_pt.h b/hw/xen/xen_pt.h
> index cf10fc7bbf..8c25932b4b 100644
> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt.h
> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define XEN_PT_H
>
> #include "hw/xen/xen_common.h"
> +#include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> #include "xen-host-pci-device.h"
> #include "qom/object.h"
>
> @@ -40,7 +41,20 @@ typedef struct XenPTReg XenPTReg;
> #define TYPE_XEN_PT_DEVICE "xen-pci-passthrough"
> OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(XenPCIPassthroughState, XEN_PT_DEVICE)
>
> +#define XEN_PT_DEVICE_CLASS(klass) \
> + OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(XenPTDeviceClass, klass, TYPE_XEN_PT_DEVICE)
> +#define XEN_PT_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> + OBJECT_GET_CLASS(XenPTDeviceClass, obj, TYPE_XEN_PT_DEVICE)
> +
> +typedef void (*XenPTQdevRealize)(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp);
> +
> +typedef struct XenPTDeviceClass {
> + PCIDeviceClass parent_class;
> + XenPTQdevRealize pci_qdev_realize;
> +} XenPTDeviceClass;
> +
> uint32_t igd_read_opregion(XenPCIPassthroughState *s);
> +void xen_igd_reserve_slot(PCIBus *pci_bus);
> void igd_write_opregion(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, uint32_t val);
> void xen_igd_passthrough_isa_bridge_create(XenPCIPassthroughState *s,
> XenHostPCIDevice *dev);
> @@ -75,6 +89,8 @@ typedef int (*xen_pt_conf_byte_read)
>
> #define XEN_PCI_INTEL_OPREGION 0xfc
>
> +#define XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK 0x4UL /* Intel IGD slot_reserved_mask */
> +
I think you want to calculate this based on dev fn:
#define XEN_PCI_IGD_SLOT_MASK \
(0x1 << PCI_SLOT(PCI_DEVFN(XEN_PCI_IGD_DEV, XEN_PCI_IGD_FN)))
> typedef enum {
> XEN_PT_GRP_TYPE_HARDWIRED = 0, /* 0 Hardwired reg group */
> XEN_PT_GRP_TYPE_EMU, /* emul reg group */
> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c b/hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c
> index 2d8cac8d54..5c108446a8 100644
> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c
> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt_stub.c
> @@ -20,3 +20,7 @@ void xen_igd_gfx_pt_set(bool value, Error **errp)
> error_setg(errp, "Xen PCI passthrough support not built in");
> }
> }
> +
> +void xen_igd_reserve_slot(PCIBus *pci_bus)
> +{
> +}
> --
> 2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a09d2427397621eaecee4c46b33507a99cc5f161.1673334040.git.brchuckz.ref@aol.com>
2023-01-10 7:08 ` [PATCH v8] xen/pt: reserve PCI slot 2 for Intel igd-passthru Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-10 8:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-01-10 13:09 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-11 15:40 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-12 19:18 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-01-12 20:11 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-12 22:55 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-01-12 23:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-13 4:14 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-13 9:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-13 21:31 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-16 15:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-16 18:00 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-17 10:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-17 14:43 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-20 15:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-17 14:50 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-20 16:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-20 19:50 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-17 11:04 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-01-18 0:15 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-18 4:27 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-18 22:39 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-20 16:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-20 19:26 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2023-01-14 2:55 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230110030331-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=brchuckz@aol.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).