From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C8EC25B4E for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pItnq-0000gD-KM; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:59:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pItno-0000em-1y; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:59:40 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pItnm-00073f-7E; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:59:39 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [77.64.253.186]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 393C520E1A45; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:59:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 393C520E1A45 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1674230377; bh=xjU0A6EWYiNLwYJgdO7eoXekRsEpTkp7GSHFPh8wy88=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VYJoKmTLzxvQbeZ93htvim0OBw5U3aD/iqNNf5Kf60ccw0wgdDA+d5hf8onikepz0 ztvsdDfbwkTDCjbeaiLXojLXLLIB4UHoF/SqMwKrP975Y7vyOwVWOjppr328rrON4w JjiuWh4imfV4foh5lbxPdmeZkx3W6ZkbJdqoRhlw= From: Evgeny Iakovlev To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] target/arm: implement DBGCLAIM registers Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:59:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20230120155929.32384-2-eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230120155929.32384-1-eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20230120155929.32384-1-eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=13.77.154.182; envelope-from=eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com; helo=linux.microsoft.com X-Spam_score_int: -197 X-Spam_score: -19.8 X-Spam_bar: ------------------- X-Spam_report: (-19.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org The architecture does not define any functionality for the CLAIM tag bits. So we will just keep the raw bits, as per spec. Signed-off-by: Evgeny Iakovlev Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/arm/cpu.h | 1 + target/arm/debug_helper.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index bf2bce046d..d1ad0939ca 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState { uint64_t dbgbcr[16]; /* breakpoint control registers */ uint64_t dbgwvr[16]; /* watchpoint value registers */ uint64_t dbgwcr[16]; /* watchpoint control registers */ + uint64_t dbgclaim; /* DBGCLAIM bits */ uint64_t mdscr_el1; uint64_t oslsr_el1; /* OS Lock Status */ uint64_t osdlr_el1; /* OS DoubleLock status */ diff --git a/target/arm/debug_helper.c b/target/arm/debug_helper.c index 2f6ddc0da5..f95a73329d 100644 --- a/target/arm/debug_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/debug_helper.c @@ -632,6 +632,24 @@ static void osdlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, } } +static void dbgclaimset_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, + uint64_t value) +{ + env->cp15.dbgclaim |= (value & 0xFF); +} + +static uint64_t dbgclaimset_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) +{ + /* CLAIM bits are RAO */ + return 0xFF; +} + +static void dbgclaimclr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, + uint64_t value) +{ + env->cp15.dbgclaim &= ~(value & 0xFF); +} + static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = { /* * DBGDRAR, DBGDSAR: always RAZ since we don't implement memory mapped @@ -715,6 +733,21 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = { .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 0, .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda, .type = ARM_CP_NOP }, + /* + * Dummy DBGCLAIM registers. + * "The architecture does not define any functionality for the CLAIM tag bits.", + * so we only keep the raw bits + */ + { .name = "DBGCLAIMSET_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH, + .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 6, + .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS, + .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda, + .writefn = dbgclaimset_write, .readfn = dbgclaimset_read }, + { .name = "DBGCLAIMCLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH, + .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 9, .opc2 = 6, + .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda, + .writefn = dbgclaimclr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write, + .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgclaim) }, }; static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_lpae_cp_reginfo[] = { -- 2.34.1