From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>, <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vhost-user: Remove the nested event loop to unbreak the DPDK use case
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230123092119.074e456b@bahia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119172424.478268-1-groug@kaod.org>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:24:22 +0100
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> The nested event loop was introduced in QEMU 6.0 to allow servicing
> of requests coming from the slave channel while waiting for an ack
> from the back-end on the master socket. It turns out this is fragile
> and breaks if the servicing of the slave channel causes a new message
> to be sent on the master socket. This is exactly what happens when
> using DPDK as reported in [0].
>
> The only identified user for the nested loop is DAX enablement that
> isn't upstream yet. Just drop the code for now. Some more clever
> solution should be designed when the need to service concurrent
> requests from both channels arises again.
>
> Greg Kurz (2):
> Revert "vhost-user: Monitor slave channel in vhost_user_read()"
> Revert "vhost-user: Introduce nested event loop in vhost_user_read()"
>
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 100 ++++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>
Hi Michael,
Can you please merge this series as you kindly proposed in [0] ?
This will help to fix [1] which is currently blocking downstream
testing.
Cheers,
--
Greg
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230118060102-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org/
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155173
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 17:24 [PATCH 0/2] vhost-user: Remove the nested event loop to unbreak the DPDK use case Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "vhost-user: Monitor slave channel in vhost_user_read()" Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 18:39 ` Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 21:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-20 15:03 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "vhost-user: Introduce nested event loop " Greg Kurz
2023-01-20 15:13 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-23 8:21 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230123092119.074e456b@bahia \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=yajunw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).