Re: [PATCH 7/7] hw/acpi/core: Trace enable and status registers of GPE separately

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:07:24 +0100
Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:

> The bit positions of both registers are related. Tracing the registers
> independently results in the same offsets across these registers which
> eases debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/acpi/core.c       | 10 +++++++---
>  hw/acpi/trace-events |  6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/core.c b/hw/acpi/core.c
> index a33e410e69..cc33605d61 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/core.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/core.c
> @@ -687,13 +687,13 @@ void acpi_gpe_ioport_writeb(ACPIREGS *ar, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
>  {
>      uint8_t *cur;
>  
> -    trace_acpi_gpe_ioport_writeb(addr, val);
> -
>      cur = acpi_gpe_ioport_get_ptr(ar, addr);
>      if (addr < ar->gpe.len / 2) {
> +        trace_acpi_gpe_sts_ioport_writeb(addr, val);
>          /* GPE_STS */
>          *cur = (*cur) & ~val;
>      } else if (addr < ar->gpe.len) {
> +        trace_acpi_gpe_en_ioport_writeb(addr - (ar->gpe.len / 2), val);
>          /* GPE_EN */
>          *cur = val;
>      } else {
> @@ -712,7 +712,11 @@ uint32_t acpi_gpe_ioport_readb(ACPIREGS *ar, uint32_t addr)
>          val = *cur;
>      }
>  
> -    trace_acpi_gpe_ioport_readb(addr, val);
> +    if (addr < ar->gpe.len / 2) {
> +        trace_acpi_gpe_sts_ioport_readb(addr, val);
> +    } else {
> +        trace_acpi_gpe_en_ioport_readb(addr - (ar->gpe.len / 2), val);
> +    }
>  
>      return val;
>  }
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/trace-events b/hw/acpi/trace-events
> index 159937ddb9..d387adfb0b 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/acpi/trace-events
> @@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ mhp_acpi_pc_dimm_deleted(uint32_t slot) "slot[0x%"PRIx32"] pc-dimm deleted"
>  mhp_acpi_pc_dimm_delete_failed(uint32_t slot) "slot[0x%"PRIx32"] pc-dimm delete failed"
>  
>  # core.c
> -acpi_gpe_ioport_readb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " ==> 0x%" PRIx8
> -acpi_gpe_ioport_writeb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " <== 0x%" PRIx8
> +acpi_gpe_sts_ioport_readb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " ==> 0x%" PRIx8
> +acpi_gpe_en_ioport_readb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " ==> 0x%" PRIx8
> +acpi_gpe_sts_ioport_writeb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " <== 0x%" PRIx8
> +acpi_gpe_en_ioport_writeb(uint32_t addr, uint8_t val) "addr: 0x%" PRIx32 " <== 0x%" PRIx8
>  
>  # cpu.c
>  cpuhp_acpi_invalid_idx_selected(uint32_t idx) "0x%"PRIx32