From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DEAC05027 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVcH-0001S3-Qm; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:10:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVcD-0001Re-8V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:10:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVcA-0008Ey-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:10:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675329039; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oInIPsGtgF1SdUE94O8ESsQmc4oBdOS27jmpiGR5HWs=; b=ChfB3YiSuiU9KcZfw6AUnqEyI4LhSHoQxR12b3ow5kPPtzG5qjMEKYSnwyGQ4v9VCau0y9 yGBfo0hKZTUxFOSbFoXwk8mJ19J7wrN+1OYt6cZb1uvFAwIBv+FUuk5//74ncFn1Q0TXDT 5wYBe2kAyQ/lGMIqI8J1S0n3uw0iOdk= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-426-3wgXyEPcNUqvvKI41lMPKQ-1; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:10:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3wgXyEPcNUqvvKI41lMPKQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742D0183B3C6; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.85]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388DB112132C; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 987DB180061B; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:10:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:10:31 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann To: David Woodhouse Cc: Kevin O'Connor , seabios , xen-devel , qemu-devel , paul Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [SeaBIOS PATCH] xen: require Xen info structure at 0x1000 to detect Xen Message-ID: <20230202091031.xmnao56wziptjak2@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kraxel@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org > Thanks, Kevin. > > I'd like to get the rest of the Xen platform support in to qemu 8.0 if > possible. Which is currently scheduled for March. > > Is there likely to be a SeaBIOS release before then which Gerd would > pull into qemu anyway, or should I submit a submodule update to a > snapshot of today's tree? That would just pull in this commit, and the > one other fix that's in the SeaBIOS tree since 1.16.1? Tagging 1.16.2 in time for the qemu 8.0 should not be a problem given that we have only bugfixes in master. Roughly around soft freeze is probably a good time for that. take care, Gerd