qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: TaiseiIto <taisei1212@outlook.jp>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PULL 4/4] target/i386/gdbstub: Fix a bug about order of FPU stack in 'g' packets.
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:41:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230222144103.467002-5-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230222144103.467002-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

From: TaiseiIto <taisei1212@outlook.jp>

Before this commit, when GDB attached an OS working on QEMU, order of FPU
stack registers printed by GDB command 'info float' was wrong. There was a
bug causing the problem in 'g' packets sent by QEMU to GDB. The packets have
values of registers of machine emulated by QEMU containing FPU stack
registers. There are 2 ways to specify a x87 FPU stack register. The first
is specifying by absolute indexed register names (R0, ..., R7). The second
is specifying by stack top relative indexed register names (ST0, ..., ST7).
Values of the FPU stack registers should be located in 'g' packet and be
ordered by the relative index. But QEMU had located these registers ordered
by the absolute index. After this commit, when QEMU reads registers to make
a 'g' packet, QEMU specifies FPU stack registers by the relative index.
Then, the registers are ordered correctly in the packet. As a result, GDB,
the packet receiver, can print FPU stack registers in the correct order.

Signed-off-by: TaiseiIto <taisei1212@outlook.jp>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <TY0PR0101MB4285923FBE9AD97CE832D95BA4E59@TY0PR0101MB4285.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/gdbstub.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/gdbstub.c b/target/i386/gdbstub.c
index c3a2cf6f2825..786971284ae7 100644
--- a/target/i386/gdbstub.c
+++ b/target/i386/gdbstub.c
@@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ int x86_cpu_gdb_read_register(CPUState *cs, GByteArray *mem_buf, int n)
             return gdb_get_reg32(mem_buf, env->regs[gpr_map32[n]]);
         }
     } else if (n >= IDX_FP_REGS && n < IDX_FP_REGS + 8) {
-        floatx80 *fp = (floatx80 *) &env->fpregs[n - IDX_FP_REGS];
+        int st_index = n - IDX_FP_REGS;
+        int r_index = (st_index + env->fpstt) % 8;
+        floatx80 *fp = &env->fpregs[r_index].d;
         int len = gdb_get_reg64(mem_buf, cpu_to_le64(fp->low));
         len += gdb_get_reg16(mem_buf, cpu_to_le16(fp->high));
         return len;
-- 
2.39.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-22 14:40 [PULL 0/4] Misc + target/i386 pull request for 2023-02-22 Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-22 14:41 ` [PULL 1/4] target/i386: Fix 32-bit AD[CO]X insns in 64-bit mode Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-22 14:41 ` [PULL 2/4] thread-posix: add support for setting threads name on OpenBSD Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-22 14:41 ` [PULL 3/4] docs: build-platforms: refine requirements on Python build dependencies Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-22 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2023-02-24 15:07 ` [PULL 0/4] Misc + target/i386 pull request for 2023-02-22 Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230222144103.467002-5-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=taisei1212@outlook.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).