From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8185BC61DA4 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 07:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pV69u-0005D1-Py; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:36:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pV69p-0005AM-Ka for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:36:51 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pV69n-0003m0-F3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:36:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1677137805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ASyfhE5gHS/9/ZnsuDYV4l/1sUH0rVd17M9urE4cC9I=; b=YxT4E8YHiJ+v7A1GCtDMlOMt+bzQDMxFFU9y+24aMQxdbyd2bo+ZxmunIre7ZFF1y0+iuE UuuHQs7FI10mBOXz0VJqznfsvPAR0tG7rsJora2D2tEEhSKtF/g39NGUYaWvo3uvtlACnD 046VF34dGDMJZ7XrQmnKRc0pKsUhqY4= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-332-l6cJH_OcOCKynrgtZAxgoQ-1; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:36:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: l6cJH_OcOCKynrgtZAxgoQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id t1-20020a7bc3c1000000b003dfe223de49so4811237wmj.5 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 23:36:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ASyfhE5gHS/9/ZnsuDYV4l/1sUH0rVd17M9urE4cC9I=; b=hf0ZwCl2N/7cJX2jwO9E3q6Ek7ZWGk9xKXn6BtfmT3p8o9g3UvPfVstkzbcNGxVXSO rzdHxjxLFMLC19eWoUHVbqZ+Z8hdGRqWASDMTPrIyDe3QPhQyhdJ+4CbeccWfyn0KHoz +SbubDhkHT0x5i9eP7pfYF+h4UQTHqSgMM69xAlLSjGf5p8zvouDWzSp5+H+9lQYfryn HG4PUtIiUe0vWcTh9FA80zSiM7aKgMvCTu7Wv74IeCIFA8plebNCFaeS7d0YrQSBDkDk LMVw8xhnm69Wjl3fJcKNXoTsBl7uxrJPMs61pJpNb2usgV8bd50ZMKTsElSRGliMMnAs 7jaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXoORwoONdaoYbMUHE/p6XBNC9pmvv2x2HjzdAayNAAMrAPZrJ0 Uy32mq3zMF4nDjmkbyQVJIYF/UCSXysXFnvmSJra47HnuBK55tkzH61ZQwne55G2kW6WQo0hFkD UEjLZ6p1GwzMnE00= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1713:b0:3de:3381:24f2 with SMTP id c19-20020a05600c171300b003de338124f2mr8928956wmn.30.1677137799128; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 23:36:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set93z9CKxLDCw0HA+9mIs3EbE4+VIterCg2CMgxWzNL9A+Mc0797R0dZXklEODfuThR5ljc0ew== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1713:b0:3de:3381:24f2 with SMTP id c19-20020a05600c171300b003de338124f2mr8928936wmn.30.1677137798737; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 23:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([2.52.2.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e8-20020a05600c218800b003c6bbe910fdsm10882914wme.9.2023.02.22.23.36.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 23:36:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:36:33 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Anton Kuchin Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, yc-core@yandex-team.ru, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Markus Armbruster , Eduardo Habkost , Juan Quintela , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Eric Blake Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vhost-user-fs: add migration type property Message-ID: <20230223023604-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <59165bde-bfd4-a073-c618-205be3951e4a@yandex-team.ru> <20230222074214-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <22fee9b6-1dc0-792c-13cf-54c9303556ab@yandex-team.ru> <8372550f-def7-4336-c597-d22155abf145@yandex-team.ru> <333c4451-8eef-0603-c3f5-10e38c0eb24e@yandex-team.ru> <20230222115106-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <11593688-7ca4-def3-6212-7c26faa4d1c6@yandex-team.ru> <20230222121133-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20230222151814-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230222151814-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:21:42PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:25:19PM +0200, Anton Kuchin wrote: > > On 22/02/2023 19:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Anton Kuchin wrote: > > > > On 22/02/2023 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Anton Kuchin wrote: > > > > > > On 22/02/2023 17:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > > > > > > On 22.02.23 17:25, Anton Kuchin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +static int vhost_user_fs_pre_save(void *opaque) > > > > > > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > > > > +    VHostUserFS *fs = opaque; > > > > > > > > > > > +    g_autofree char *path = object_get_canonical_path(OBJECT(fs)); > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > +    switch (fs->migration_type) { > > > > > > > > > > > +    case VHOST_USER_MIGRATION_TYPE_NONE: > > > > > > > > > > > +        error_report("Migration is blocked by device %s", path); > > > > > > > > > > > +        break; > > > > > > > > > > > +    case VHOST_USER_MIGRATION_TYPE_EXTERNAL: > > > > > > > > > > > +        return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > +    default: > > > > > > > > > > > +        error_report("Migration type '%s' is not > > > > > > > > > > > supported by device %s", > > > > > > > > > > > + VhostUserMigrationType_str(fs->migration_type), path); > > > > > > > > > > > +        break; > > > > > > > > > > > +    } > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > +    return -1; > > > > > > > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > > > Should we also add this as .pre_load, to force user select > > > > > > > > > > correct migration_type on target too? > > > > > > > > > In fact, I would claim we only want pre_load. > > > > > > > > > When qemu is started on destination we know where it's migrated > > > > > > > > > from so this flag can be set. > > > > > > > > > When qemu is started on source we generally do not yet know so > > > > > > > > > we don't know whether it's safe to set this flag. > > > > > > > But destination is a "source" for next migration, so there shouldn't be > > > > > > > real difference. > > > > > > > The new property has ".realized_set_allowed = true", so, as I understand > > > > > > > it may be changed at any time, so that's not a problem. > > > > > > Yes, exactly. So destination's property sets not how it will handle this > > > > > > incoming > > > > > > migration but the future outgoing one. > > > > > How do you know where you are going to migrate though? > > > > > I think you don't. > > > > > Setting it on source is better since we know where we > > > > > are migrating from. > > > > Yes, I don't know where I'm going to migrate to. This is why property > > > > affects only how source saves state on outgoing migration. > > > Um. I don't get the logic. > > > > For this feature to work we need orchestrator to manage the migration. And > > we > > generally assume that it is responsibility of orchestrator to ensure > > matching > > properties on source and destination. > > As orchestrator manages both sides of migration it can set option (and we > > can > > check it) on either source or destination. Now it's not important which side > > we > > select, because now the option is essentially binary allow/deny (but IMHO it > > is much better to refuse source to migrate than find later that state can't > > be > > loaded by destination, in case of file migration this becomes especially > > painful). > > > > But there are plans to add internal migration option (extract FUSE state > > from > > backend and transfer it in QEMU migration stream), and that's where > > setting/checking > > on source becomes important because it will rely on this property to decide > > if > > extra state form backend needs to be put in the migration stream subsection. > > > If we do internal migration that will be a different property > which has to match on source *and* destination. > > > > If you are concerned about orchestrator breaking assumption of matching > > properties > > on source and destination this is not really supported AFAIK but I don't > > think we > > need to punish it for this, maybe it has its reasons: I can imagine scenario > > where orchestrator could want to migrate from source with > > 'migration=external' > > to destination with 'migration=none' to ensure that destination can't be > > migrated further. > > No. I am concerned about a simple practical matter: > - I decide to restart qemu on the same host - so I need to enable > migration > - Later I decide to migrate qemu to another host - this should be > blocked > > > Property on source does not satisfy both at the same time. > Property on destination does. Stefan what's your take on this? Should we move this from save to load hook? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This property selects if VM can migrate and if it can what should > > > > > > > > qemu put > > > > > > > > to the migration stream. So we select on source what type of > > > > > > > > migration is > > > > > > > > allowed for this VM, destination can't check anything at load time. > > > > > > > OK, so the new field "migration" regulates only outgoing migration and > > > > > > > do nothing for incoming. On incoming migration the migration stream > > > > > > > itself defines the type of device migration. > > > > > > > Worth mentioning in doc? > > > > > > Good point. I don't think this deserves a respin but if I have to send v4 > > > > > > I'll include > > > > > > clarification in it.