From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts and qemu-system-i386
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:10:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230227111050.54083-2-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230227111050.54083-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Hardly anybody still uses 32-bit x86 hosts today, so we should
start deprecating them to finally have less test efforts.
With regards to 32-bit KVM support in the x86 Linux kernel,
the developers confirmed that they do not need a recent
qemu-system-i386 binary here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/Y%2ffkTs5ajFy0hP1U@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 15084f7bea..98517f5187 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ CI coverage support may bitrot away before the deprecation process
completes. The little endian variants of MIPS (both 32 and 64 bit) are
still a supported host architecture.
+32-bit x86 hosts and ``qemu-system-i386`` (since 8.0)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+Testing 32-bit x86 host OS support takes a lot of precious time during the
+QEMU contiguous integration tests, and considering that most OS vendors
+stopped shipping 32-bit variants of their x86 OS distributions and most
+x86 hardware from the past >10 years is capable of 64-bit, keeping the
+32-bit support alive is an inadequate burden for the QEMU project. Thus
+QEMU will soon drop the support for 32-bit x86 host systems and the
+``qemu-system-i386`` binary. Use ``qemu-system-x86_64`` (which is a proper
+superset of ``qemu-system-i386``) on a 64-bit host machine instead.
+
+
QEMU API (QAPI) events
----------------------
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-27 11:10 [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 11:10 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-02-27 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts and qemu-system-i386 Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-27 20:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-27 20:21 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-28 8:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 12:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-28 9:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 16:57 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-27 22:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-28 7:43 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 8:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 8:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 9:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 9:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 9:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 10:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 10:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-28 10:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 11:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 11:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 11:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-28 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-27 20:25 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-28 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts and qemu-system-arm Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 18:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 7:39 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 9:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 11:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 20:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-01 6:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-01 7:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-03-01 7:46 ` Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230227111050.54083-2-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).