From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 17:31:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302163106.465559-2-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302163106.465559-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Hardly anybody really requires the i386 binary anymore, since the
qemu-system-x86_64 binary is a proper superset. So let's deprecate
the 32-bit variant now, so that we can finally stop wasting our time
and CI minutes with this.
With regards to 32-bit KVM support in the x86 Linux kernel,
the developers confirmed that they do not need a recent
qemu-system-i386 binary here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/Y%2ffkTs5ajFy0hP1U@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 15084f7bea..11700adac9 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -34,6 +34,18 @@ deprecating the build option and no longer defend it in CI. The
``--enable-gcov`` build option remains for analysis test case
coverage.
+``qemu-system-i386`` binary (since 8.0)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+The ``qemu-system-i386`` binary was mainly useful for running with KVM
+on 32-bit x86 hosts, but most Linux distributions already removed their
+support for 32-bit x86 kernels, so hardly anybody still needs this. The
+``qemu-system-x86_64`` binary is a proper superset and can be used to
+run 32-bit guests by selecting a 32-bit CPU model, including KVM support
+on x86_64 hosts. Thus users are recommended to reconfigure their systems
+to use the ``qemu-system-x86_64`` binary instead.
+
+
System emulator command line arguments
--------------------------------------
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 16:31 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-03-02 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:49 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:52 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:53 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-arm binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 22:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 7:36 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 0:55 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-03 11:16 ` Peter Maydell
2023-03-03 11:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth
2023-03-02 18:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 21:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 0:57 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2023-03-02 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-03 9:48 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:09 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 11:57 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-03-03 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302163106.465559-2-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).