From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts for system emulation
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:46:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306084658.29709-2-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306084658.29709-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Hardly anybody still uses 32-bit x86 hosts today, so we should start
deprecating them to stop wasting our time and CI minutes here.
For example, there are also still some unresolved problems with these:
When emulating 64-bit binaries in user mode, TCG does not honor atomicity
for 64-bit accesses, which is "perhaps worse than not working at all"
(quoting Richard). Let's simply make it clear that people should use
64-bit x86 hosts nowadays and we do not intend to fix/maintain the old
32-bit stuff.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 15084f7bea..1ca9dc33d6 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -196,6 +196,17 @@ CI coverage support may bitrot away before the deprecation process
completes. The little endian variants of MIPS (both 32 and 64 bit) are
still a supported host architecture.
+System emulation on 32-bit x86 hosts (since 8.0)
+''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+Support for 32-bit x86 host deployments is increasingly uncommon in mainstream
+OS distributions given the widespread availability of 64-bit x86 hardware.
+The QEMU project no longer considers 32-bit x86 support for system emulation to
+be an effective use of its limited resources, and thus intends to discontinue
+it. Since all recent x86 hardware from the past >10 years is capable of the
+64-bit x86 extensions, a corresponding 64-bit OS should be used instead.
+
+
QEMU API (QAPI) events
----------------------
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 8:46 [PATCH v4 0/5] Deprecate system emulation support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 8:46 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-03-06 8:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 9:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 9:54 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 9:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 13:48 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:18 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06 8:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 system emulation job Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 9:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06 8:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts for system emulation Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 9:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-07 2:43 ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-06 8:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230306084658.29709-2-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).