From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] target/s390x: Update do_unaligned_access() comment
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313153844.9231-12-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313153844.9231-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Relative long instructions now depend on do_unaligned_access() too.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c
index bc767f04438..cafdef77234 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/excp_helper.c
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ void HELPER(data_exception)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t dxc)
/*
* Unaligned accesses are only diagnosed with MO_ALIGN. At the moment,
- * this is only for the atomic operations, for which we want to raise a
- * specification exception.
+ * this is only for the atomic and relative long operations, for which we want
+ * to raise a specification exception.
*/
static G_NORETURN
void do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, uintptr_t retaddr)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 15:38 [PATCH v2 00/12] target/s390x: Handle unaligned accesses Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] target/s390x: Handle branching to odd addresses Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 19:54 ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] target/s390x: Handle EXECUTE of " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] target/s390x: Handle LGRL from non-aligned addresses Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] target/s390x: Handle LRL and LGFRL " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] target/s390x: Handle LLGFRL " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] target/s390x: Handle CRL and CGFRL with " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] target/s390x: Handle CGRL and CLGRL " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] target/s390x: Handle CLRL and CLGFRL " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] target/s390x: Handle STRL to " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] target/s390x: Handle STGRL " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-13 15:38 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-03-13 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] tests/tcg/s390x: Test unaligned accesses Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-03-15 18:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-15 18:13 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313153844.9231-12-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).