qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hw/pci-bridge: Fix release ordering by embedding PCIBridgeWindows within PCIBridge
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 13:09:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421130919.00006ab2@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b797ee27-2182-e391-9f39-dce51db7e07d@linaro.org>

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 08:26:43 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 20/4/23 16:59, Jonathan Cameron via wrote:
> > The lifetime of the PCIBridgeWindows instance accessed via the windows pointer
> > in struct PCIBridge is managed separately from the PCIBridge itself.
> > 
> > Triggered by ./qemu-system-x86_64 -M x-remote -display none -monitor stdio
> > QEMU monitor: device_add cxl-downstream
> > 
> > In some error handling paths (such as the above due to attaching a cxl-downstream
> > port anything other than a cxl-upstream port) the g_free() of the PCIBridge
> > windows in pci_bridge_region_cleanup() is called before the final call of
> > flatview_uref() in address_space_set_flatview() ultimately from
> > drain_call_rcu()
> > 
> > At one stage this resulted in a crash, currently can still be observed using
> > valgrind which records a use after free.
> > 
> > When present, only one instance is allocated. pci_bridge_update_mappings()
> > can operate directly on an instance rather than creating a new one and
> > swapping it in.  Thus there appears to be no reason to not directly
> > couple the lifetimes of the two structures by embedding the PCIBridgeWindows
> > within the PCIBridge removing the need for the problematic separate free.
> > 
> > Patch is same as was posted deep in the discussion.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230403171232.000020bb@huawei.com/
> > 
> > Posted as an RFC as only lightly tested and I'm not sure what the reasoning
> > behind the separation of lifetimes originally was. As such perhaps this is
> > not the best route to fixing the issue.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/pci/pci_bridge.c         | 20 ++++++++------------
> >   include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h |  3 ++-
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)  
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > index 01670e9e65..ac75ec0c1b 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> >   #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> >   #include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> >   #include "qom/object.h"
> > +#include "qemu/rcu.h"  
> 
> Where is this header is used

Left over garbage from a previous attempt to fix.  Good spot.
I'll clean that out and resend shortly.

Thanks,

Jonathan
 
> 
> >   typedef struct PCIBridgeWindows PCIBridgeWindows;
> >   
> > @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ struct PCIBridge {
> >       MemoryRegion address_space_mem;
> >       MemoryRegion address_space_io;
> >   
> > -    PCIBridgeWindows *windows;
> > +    PCIBridgeWindows windows;
> >   
> >       pci_map_irq_fn map_irq;
> >       const char *bus_name;  
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-21 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-20 14:59 [PATCH] hw/pci-bridge: Fix release ordering by embedding PCIBridgeWindows within PCIBridge Jonathan Cameron via
2023-04-20 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-04-21  6:26 ` [RFC PATCH] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-04-21 12:09   ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230421130919.00006ab2@Huawei.com \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).