From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: [PATCH v20 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:14:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230425161456.21031-7-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425161456.21031-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
When the host supports the CPU topology facility, the PTF
instruction with function code 2 is interpreted by the SIE,
provided that the userland hypervisor activates the interpretation
by using the KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY KVM extension.
The PTF instructions with function code 0 and 1 are intercepted
and must be emulated by the userland hypervisor.
During RESET all CPU of the configuration are placed in
horizontal polarity.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 6 ++++
hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 11 +++++++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
index 9bba21a916..c1d46e78af 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
@@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ struct S390CcwMachineState {
uint8_t loadparm[8];
};
+#define S390_PTF_REASON_NONE (0x00 << 8)
+#define S390_PTF_REASON_DONE (0x01 << 8)
+#define S390_PTF_REASON_BUSY (0x02 << 8)
+#define S390_TOPO_FC_MASK 0xffUL
+void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra);
+
struct S390CcwMachineClass {
/*< private >*/
MachineClass parent_class;
diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
index c98439ff7a..3c7bbff4bc 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
@@ -96,6 +96,56 @@ static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms)
QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&s390_topology.list, entry, next);
}
+/*
+ * s390_handle_ptf:
+ *
+ * @register 1: contains the function code
+ *
+ * Function codes 0 (horizontal) and 1 (vertical) define the CPU
+ * polarization requested by the guest.
+ *
+ * Function code 2 is handling topology changes and is interpreted
+ * by the SIE.
+ */
+void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra)
+{
+ CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
+ uint64_t reg = env->regs[r1];
+ int fc = reg & S390_TOPO_FC_MASK;
+
+ if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY)) {
+ s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERATION, ra);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
+ s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, ra);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (reg & ~S390_TOPO_FC_MASK) {
+ s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ switch (fc) {
+ case S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_VERTICAL:
+ case S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_HORIZONTAL:
+ if (s390_topology.vertical_polarization == !!fc) {
+ env->regs[r1] |= S390_PTF_REASON_DONE;
+ setcc(cpu, 2);
+ } else {
+ s390_topology.vertical_polarization = !!fc;
+ s390_cpu_topology_set_changed(true);
+ setcc(cpu, 0);
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* Note that fc == 2 is interpreted by the SIE */
+ s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
+ }
+}
+
/**
* s390_topology_reset:
*
@@ -105,6 +155,7 @@ static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms)
void s390_topology_reset(void)
{
s390_cpu_topology_set_changed(false);
+ s390_topology.vertical_polarization = false;
}
/**
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index bc953151ce..fb63be41b7 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
#define PRIV_B9_EQBS 0x9c
#define PRIV_B9_CLP 0xa0
+#define PRIV_B9_PTF 0xa2
#define PRIV_B9_PCISTG 0xd0
#define PRIV_B9_PCILG 0xd2
#define PRIV_B9_RPCIT 0xd3
@@ -1464,6 +1465,13 @@ static int kvm_mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
}
}
+static void kvm_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ uint8_t r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb >> 20) & 0x0f;
+
+ s390_handle_ptf(cpu, r1, RA_IGNORED);
+}
+
static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1)
{
int r = 0;
@@ -1481,6 +1489,9 @@ static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1)
case PRIV_B9_RPCIT:
r = kvm_rpcit_service_call(cpu, run);
break;
+ case PRIV_B9_PTF:
+ kvm_handle_ptf(cpu, run);
+ break;
case PRIV_B9_EQBS:
/* just inject exception */
r = -1;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 16:14 [PATCH v20 00/21] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 8:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:27 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:36 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:54 ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 11:17 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:05 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-02 13:48 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03 7:23 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 02/21] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 13:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:35 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:12 ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 10:23 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 13:48 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:30 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03 7:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 11:23 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 17:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:42 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 17:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-03 8:43 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 13:01 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 04/21] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 05/21] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-05-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v20 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-05 9:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 07/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 08/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:42 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 8:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 09/21] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-06-12 7:55 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 10/21] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:49 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 11/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 21:47 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 12:31 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 12/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-10 12:04 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-12 11:56 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 13/21] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 11:58 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 15/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:45 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:01 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:47 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:22 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 18/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 19/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 20/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 21/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology query-cpu-polarization Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230425161456.21031-7-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).