From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
philmd@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru,
lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
quintela@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pci: ROM preallocation for incoming migration
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:43:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230426002135-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425161434.173022-4-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 07:14:34PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On incoming migration we have the following sequence to load option
> ROM:
>
> 1. On device realize we do normal load ROM from the file
>
> 2. Than, on incoming migration we rewrite ROM from the incoming RAM
> block. If sizes mismatch we fail.
let's mention an example error message:
Size mismatch: 0000:00:03.0/virtio-net-pci.rom: 0x40000 != 0x80000: Invalid argument
>
> This is not ideal when we migrate to updated distribution: we have to
> keep old ROM files in new distribution and be careful around romfile
> property to load correct ROM file.
> Which is loaded actually just to
> allocate the ROM with correct length.
> Note, that romsize property doesn't really help: if we try to specify
> it when default romfile is larger, it fails with something like:
>
> romfile "efi-virtio.rom" (160768 bytes) is too large for ROM size 65536
Something I'd like to clarify is that the comment applies to uses where
users/distributions supply their own ROM file. And lots of
users/distributions seem to have already painted themselves into a
corner by supplying a mix of ROM files of unmatching sizes -
basically they don't understand the detail of live migration,
ROM size interaction with it and with memory layout, etc -
as a very small number of people does.
For example, ubuntu doubled ROM file size by padding their ROMs
with 0xffffffff at some point, breaking migration for all existing machine
types.
just a web search for
Size mismatch: 0000:00:03.0/virtio-net-pci.rom: 0x40000 != 0x80000: Invalid argument
will turn up a bunch of confused distros and users.
>
> Let's just ignore ROM file when romsize is specified and we are in
> incoming migration state. In other words, we need only to preallocate
> ROM of specified size, local ROM file is unrelated.
>
> This way:
>
> If romsize was specified on source, we just use same commandline as on
> source, and migration will work independently of local ROM files on
> target.
>
> If romsize was not specified on source (and we have mismatching local
> ROM file on target host), we have to specify romsize on target to match
> source romsize. romfile parameter may be kept same as on source or may
> be dropped, the file is not loaded anyway.
>
> As a bonus we avoid extra reading from ROM file on target.
>
> Note: when we don't have romsize parameter on source command line and
> need it for target, it may be calculated as aligned up to power of two
> size of ROM file on source (if we know, which file is it) or,
> alternatively it may be retrieved from source QEMU by QMP qom-get
> command, like
>
> { "execute": "qom-get",
> "arguments": {
> "path": "/machine/peripheral/CARD_ID/virtio-net-pci.rom[0]",
> "property": "size" } }
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
> ---
> hw/pci/pci.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index a442f8fce1..e2cab622e4 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include "migration/vmstate.h"
> #include "net/net.h"
> #include "sysemu/numa.h"
> +#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> #include "hw/loader.h"
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> @@ -2293,10 +2294,16 @@ static void pci_add_option_rom(PCIDevice *pdev, bool is_default_rom,
> {
> int64_t size;
> g_autofree char *path = NULL;
> - void *ptr;
> char name[32];
> const VMStateDescription *vmsd;
>
> + /*
> + * In case of incoming migration ROM will come with migration stream, no
> + * reason to load the file. Neither we want to fail if local ROM file
> + * mismatches with specified romsize.
> + */
> + bool load_file = !runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE);
> +
> if (!pdev->romfile) {
> return;
> }
CC pbonzini,dgilbert,quintela,armbru : guys, is poking at runstate_check like
this the right way to figure out we are not going to use the
device locally before incoming migration will overwrite ROM contents?
> @@ -2329,32 +2336,35 @@ static void pci_add_option_rom(PCIDevice *pdev, bool is_default_rom,
> return;
> }
>
> - path = qemu_find_file(QEMU_FILE_TYPE_BIOS, pdev->romfile);
> - if (path == NULL) {
> - path = g_strdup(pdev->romfile);
> - }
> + if (load_file || pdev->romsize == -1) {
> + path = qemu_find_file(QEMU_FILE_TYPE_BIOS, pdev->romfile);
> + if (path == NULL) {
> + path = g_strdup(pdev->romfile);
> + }
>
> - size = get_image_size(path);
> - if (size < 0) {
> - error_setg(errp, "failed to find romfile \"%s\"", pdev->romfile);
> - return;
> - } else if (size == 0) {
> - error_setg(errp, "romfile \"%s\" is empty", pdev->romfile);
> - return;
> - } else if (size > 2 * GiB) {
> - error_setg(errp, "romfile \"%s\" too large (size cannot exceed 2 GiB)",
> - pdev->romfile);
> - return;
> - }
> - if (pdev->romsize != -1) {
> - if (size > pdev->romsize) {
> - error_setg(errp, "romfile \"%s\" (%u bytes) "
> - "is too large for ROM size %u",
> - pdev->romfile, (uint32_t)size, pdev->romsize);
> + size = get_image_size(path);
> + if (size < 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "failed to find romfile \"%s\"", pdev->romfile);
> + return;
> + } else if (size == 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "romfile \"%s\" is empty", pdev->romfile);
> + return;
> + } else if (size > 2 * GiB) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "romfile \"%s\" too large (size cannot exceed 2 GiB)",
> + pdev->romfile);
> return;
> }
> - } else {
> - pdev->romsize = pow2ceil(size);
> + if (pdev->romsize != -1) {
> + if (size > pdev->romsize) {
> + error_setg(errp, "romfile \"%s\" (%u bytes) "
> + "is too large for ROM size %u",
> + pdev->romfile, (uint32_t)size, pdev->romsize);
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + pdev->romsize = pow2ceil(size);
> + }
> }
>
> vmsd = qdev_get_vmsd(DEVICE(pdev));
> @@ -2365,15 +2375,18 @@ static void pci_add_option_rom(PCIDevice *pdev, bool is_default_rom,
> memory_region_init_rom(&pdev->rom, OBJECT(pdev), name, pdev->romsize,
> &error_fatal);
>
> - ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&pdev->rom);
> - if (load_image_size(path, ptr, size) < 0) {
> - error_setg(errp, "failed to load romfile \"%s\"", pdev->romfile);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (load_file) {
> + void *ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&pdev->rom);
>
> - if (is_default_rom) {
> - /* Only the default rom images will be patched (if needed). */
> - pci_patch_ids(pdev, ptr, size);
> + if (load_image_size(path, ptr, size) < 0) {
> + error_setg(errp, "failed to load romfile \"%s\"", pdev->romfile);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_default_rom) {
> + /* Only the default rom images will be patched (if needed). */
> + pci_patch_ids(pdev, ptr, size);
> + }
> }
it kind of feels weird to ignore
> pci_register_bar(pdev, PCI_ROM_SLOT, 0, &pdev->rom);
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 16:14 [PATCH v2 0/3] ROM migration Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pci: pci_add_option_rom(): improve style Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-02 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pci: pci_add_option_rom(): refactor: use g_autofree for path variable Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-02 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pci: ROM preallocation for incoming migration Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-04-26 4:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-04-26 20:00 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-02 9:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-02 9:59 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-02 10:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-02 10:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-02 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-09 15:48 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-28 8:30 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-28 20:37 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-03 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-03 9:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-03 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-03 11:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-05-09 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-09 16:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-10 9:38 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-04-25 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ROM migration Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-04-25 20:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-26 9:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230426002135-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).