qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE
@ 2023-05-01 23:04 Stefan Hajnoczi
  2023-05-03  7:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2023-05-01 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Stefan Hajnoczi, Cindy Lu, Yajun Wu

Setting the VIRTIO Device Status Field to 0 resets the device. The
device's state is lost, including the vring configuration.

vhost-user.c currently sends SET_STATUS 0 before GET_VRING_BASE. This
risks confusion about the lifetime of the vhost-user state (e.g. vring
last_avail_idx) across VIRTIO device reset.

Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> adjusted the order for vhost-vdpa.c
in commit c3716f260bff ("vdpa: move vhost reset after get vring base")
and in that commit description suggested doing the same for vhost-user
in the future.

Go ahead and adjust vhost-user.c now. I ran various online code searches
to identify vhost-user backends implementing SET_STATUS. It seems only
DPDK implements SET_STATUS and Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com> has
confirmed that it is safe to make this change.

Fixes: commit 923b8921d210763359e96246a58658ac0db6c645 ("vhost-user: Support vhost_dev_start")
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
Cc: Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
v2:
- Added VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS check [Yajun Wu]
- Added "Fixes:" tag [Michael]
---
 hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index e5285df4ba..40974afd06 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -2677,7 +2677,20 @@ static int vhost_user_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool started)
                                           VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER |
                                           VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
     } else {
-        return vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
+        return 0;
+    }
+}
+
+static void vhost_user_reset_status(struct vhost_dev *dev)
+{
+    /* Set device status only for last queue pair */
+    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs != dev->vq_index_end) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
+                           VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS)) {
+        vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
     }
 }
 
@@ -2716,4 +2729,5 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
         .vhost_get_inflight_fd = vhost_user_get_inflight_fd,
         .vhost_set_inflight_fd = vhost_user_set_inflight_fd,
         .vhost_dev_start = vhost_user_dev_start,
+        .vhost_reset_status = vhost_user_reset_status,
 };
-- 
2.40.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE
  2023-05-01 23:04 [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2023-05-03  7:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
  2023-05-04  3:40 ` Yajun Wu
  2023-05-05 15:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2023-05-03  7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Cindy Lu, Yajun Wu



On 5/2/23 01:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Setting the VIRTIO Device Status Field to 0 resets the device. The
> device's state is lost, including the vring configuration.
> 
> vhost-user.c currently sends SET_STATUS 0 before GET_VRING_BASE. This
> risks confusion about the lifetime of the vhost-user state (e.g. vring
> last_avail_idx) across VIRTIO device reset.
> 
> Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> adjusted the order for vhost-vdpa.c
> in commit c3716f260bff ("vdpa: move vhost reset after get vring base")
> and in that commit description suggested doing the same for vhost-user
> in the future.
> 
> Go ahead and adjust vhost-user.c now. I ran various online code searches
> to identify vhost-user backends implementing SET_STATUS. It seems only
> DPDK implements SET_STATUS and Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com> has
> confirmed that it is safe to make this change.
> 
> Fixes: commit 923b8921d210763359e96246a58658ac0db6c645 ("vhost-user: Support vhost_dev_start")
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Added VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS check [Yajun Wu]
> - Added "Fixes:" tag [Michael]
> ---
>   hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index e5285df4ba..40974afd06 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -2677,7 +2677,20 @@ static int vhost_user_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool started)
>                                             VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER |
>                                             VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
>       } else {
> -        return vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_user_reset_status(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +{
> +    /* Set device status only for last queue pair */
> +    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs != dev->vq_index_end) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> +                           VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS)) {
> +        vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
>       }
>   }
>   
> @@ -2716,4 +2729,5 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
>           .vhost_get_inflight_fd = vhost_user_get_inflight_fd,
>           .vhost_set_inflight_fd = vhost_user_set_inflight_fd,
>           .vhost_dev_start = vhost_user_dev_start,
> +        .vhost_reset_status = vhost_user_reset_status,
>   };

I confirm it won't introduce regression on DPDK side:

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE
  2023-05-01 23:04 [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE Stefan Hajnoczi
  2023-05-03  7:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
@ 2023-05-04  3:40 ` Yajun Wu
  2023-05-05 15:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yajun Wu @ 2023-05-04  3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Cindy Lu


On 5/2/2023 7:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Setting the VIRTIO Device Status Field to 0 resets the device. The
> device's state is lost, including the vring configuration.
>
> vhost-user.c currently sends SET_STATUS 0 before GET_VRING_BASE. This
> risks confusion about the lifetime of the vhost-user state (e.g. vring
> last_avail_idx) across VIRTIO device reset.
>
> Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> adjusted the order for vhost-vdpa.c
> in commit c3716f260bff ("vdpa: move vhost reset after get vring base")
> and in that commit description suggested doing the same for vhost-user
> in the future.
>
> Go ahead and adjust vhost-user.c now. I ran various online code searches
> to identify vhost-user backends implementing SET_STATUS. It seems only
> DPDK implements SET_STATUS and Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com> has
> confirmed that it is safe to make this change.
>
> Fixes: commit 923b8921d210763359e96246a58658ac0db6c645 ("vhost-user: Support vhost_dev_start")
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Added VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS check [Yajun Wu]
> - Added "Fixes:" tag [Michael]
> ---
>   hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index e5285df4ba..40974afd06 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -2677,7 +2677,20 @@ static int vhost_user_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool started)
>                                             VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER |
>                                             VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
>       } else {
> -        return vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_user_reset_status(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +{
> +    /* Set device status only for last queue pair */
> +    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs != dev->vq_index_end) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> +                           VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS)) {
> +        vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
>       }
>   }
>
> @@ -2716,4 +2729,5 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
>           .vhost_get_inflight_fd = vhost_user_get_inflight_fd,
>           .vhost_set_inflight_fd = vhost_user_set_inflight_fd,
>           .vhost_dev_start = vhost_user_dev_start,
> +        .vhost_reset_status = vhost_user_reset_status,
>   };
> --
> 2.40.1

Reviewed-by: Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE
  2023-05-01 23:04 [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE Stefan Hajnoczi
  2023-05-03  7:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
  2023-05-04  3:40 ` Yajun Wu
@ 2023-05-05 15:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eugenio Perez Martin @ 2023-05-05 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi; +Cc: qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin, Cindy Lu, Yajun Wu

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:42 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Setting the VIRTIO Device Status Field to 0 resets the device. The
> device's state is lost, including the vring configuration.
>
> vhost-user.c currently sends SET_STATUS 0 before GET_VRING_BASE. This
> risks confusion about the lifetime of the vhost-user state (e.g. vring
> last_avail_idx) across VIRTIO device reset.
>
> Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> adjusted the order for vhost-vdpa.c
> in commit c3716f260bff ("vdpa: move vhost reset after get vring base")
> and in that commit description suggested doing the same for vhost-user
> in the future.
>
> Go ahead and adjust vhost-user.c now. I ran various online code searches
> to identify vhost-user backends implementing SET_STATUS. It seems only
> DPDK implements SET_STATUS and Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com> has
> confirmed that it is safe to make this change.
>
> Fixes: commit 923b8921d210763359e96246a58658ac0db6c645 ("vhost-user: Support vhost_dev_start")
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>

> ---
> v2:
> - Added VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS check [Yajun Wu]
> - Added "Fixes:" tag [Michael]
> ---
>  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index e5285df4ba..40974afd06 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -2677,7 +2677,20 @@ static int vhost_user_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool started)
>                                            VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER |
>                                            VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
>      } else {
> -        return vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_user_reset_status(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +{
> +    /* Set device status only for last queue pair */
> +    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs != dev->vq_index_end) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features,
> +                           VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS)) {
> +        vhost_user_set_status(dev, 0);
>      }
>  }
>
> @@ -2716,4 +2729,5 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
>          .vhost_get_inflight_fd = vhost_user_get_inflight_fd,
>          .vhost_set_inflight_fd = vhost_user_set_inflight_fd,
>          .vhost_dev_start = vhost_user_dev_start,
> +        .vhost_reset_status = vhost_user_reset_status,
>  };
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-05 15:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-01 23:04 [PATCH v2] vhost-user: send SET_STATUS 0 after GET_VRING_BASE Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-03  7:22 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-05-04  3:40 ` Yajun Wu
2023-05-05 15:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).