From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Mads Ynddal <m.ynddal@samsung.com>
Cc: Mads Ynddal <mads@ynddal.dk>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] simpletrace: Improve parsing of sys.argv; fix files never closed.
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 11:08:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230508150821.GD581920@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0713AFC1-299C-47A2-8746-49AD8C70185D@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1080 bytes --]
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:18:40PM +0000, Mads Ynddal wrote:
> > simpletrace.py is both a command-line tool and a Python module. The
> > Python module has a public API that people's scripts may rely on. Let's
> > avoid breaking API changes unless necessary so that existing scripts
> > that import simpletrace continue to work.
> >
> > It's not very clear what is a public API in simpletrace.py, the file
> > should really have __all__ = ['Analyzer', 'process', 'run'].
> > Nevertheless, Analyzer's doc comments mention process() and the
> > process() function itself also has doc comments, so it's a public API.
> >
> > Please drop this change to avoid breaking the public API.
>
> I agree, I'll revert the changes. I can add an `__all__` too.
>
> I'd like to avoid having the same `open`, `read_trace_header` and `read_events`
> multiple places. Would it be acceptable to let `process` be more of a stub and
> move the logic to an internal `_process` function maybe?
Yes, as long as the existing public API doesn't change that would be
fine.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-02 9:23 [PATCH v2 00/12] simpletrace: refactor and general improvements Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] simpletrace: Improve parsing of sys.argv; fix files never closed Mads Ynddal
2023-05-04 18:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-08 13:18 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-08 15:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] simpletrace: Annotate magic constants from QEMU code Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-15 6:51 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] simpletrace: changed naming of edict and idtoname to improve readability Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] simpletrace: update code for Python 3.11 Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-15 6:47 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] simpletrace: Changed Analyzer class to become context-manager Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-15 7:48 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] simpletrace: Simplify construction of tracing methods Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-15 8:11 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] simpletrace: Improved error handling on struct unpack Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] simpletrace: define exception and add handling Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] simpletrace: Refactor to separate responsibilities Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer of simpletrace.py Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] scripts/analyse-locks-simpletrace.py: changed iteritems() to items() Mads Ynddal
2023-05-02 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] scripts/analyse-locks-simpletrace.py: reflect changes to process in simpletrace.py Mads Ynddal
2023-05-03 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] simpletrace: refactor and general improvements John Snow
2023-05-08 13:28 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-08 15:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-10 19:14 ` John Snow
2023-05-04 17:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-04 17:53 ` John Snow
2023-05-08 15:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-05-08 16:50 ` Mads Ynddal
2023-05-09 14:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230508150821.GD581920@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=m.ynddal@samsung.com \
--cc=mads@ynddal.dk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).