From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 3/3] vfio/pci: Static Resizable BAR capability
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 15:59:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509215923.3186420-4-alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509215923.3186420-1-alex.williamson@redhat.com>
The PCI Resizable BAR (ReBAR) capability is currently hidden from the
VM because the protocol for interacting with the capability does not
support a mechanism for the device to reject an advertised supported
BAR size. However, when assigned to a VM, the act of resizing the
BAR requires adjustment of host resources for the device, which
absolutely can fail. Linux does not currently allow us to reserve
resources for the device independent of the current usage.
The only writable field within the ReBAR capability is the BAR Size
register. The PCIe spec indicates that when written, the device
should immediately begin to operate with the provided BAR size. The
spec however also notes that software must only write values
corresponding to supported sizes as indicated in the capability and
control registers. Writing unsupported sizes produces undefined
results. Therefore, if the hypervisor were to virtualize the
capability and control registers such that the current size is the
only indicated available size, then a write of anything other than
the current size falls into the category of undefined behavior,
where we can essentially expose the modified ReBAR capability as
read-only.
This may seem pointless, but users have reported that virtualizing
the capability in this way not only allows guest software to expose
related features as available (even if only cosmetic), but in some
scenarios can resolve guest driver issues. Additionally, no
regressions in behavior have been reported for this change.
A caveat here is that the PCIe spec requires for compatibility that
devices report support for a size in the range of 1MB to 512GB,
therefore if the current BAR size falls outside that range we revert
to hiding the capability.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505232308.2869912-1-alex.williamson@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
hw/vfio/pci.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index cf27f28936cb..bf27a3990564 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -2066,6 +2066,54 @@ static int vfio_add_std_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, uint8_t pos, Error **errp)
return 0;
}
+static int vfio_setup_rebar_ecap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, uint16_t pos)
+{
+ uint32_t ctrl;
+ int i, nbar;
+
+ ctrl = pci_get_long(vdev->pdev.config + pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
+ nbar = (ctrl & PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK) >> PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_SHIFT;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nbar; i++) {
+ uint32_t cap;
+ int size;
+
+ ctrl = pci_get_long(vdev->pdev.config + pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL + (i * 8));
+ size = (ctrl & PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE) >> PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SHIFT;
+
+ /* The cap register reports sizes 1MB to 128TB, with 4 reserved bits */
+ cap = size <= 27 ? 1U << (size + 4) : 0;
+
+ /*
+ * The PCIe spec (v6.0.1, 7.8.6) requires HW to support at least one
+ * size in the range 1MB to 512GB. We intend to mask all sizes except
+ * the one currently enabled in the size field, therefore if it's
+ * outside the range, hide the whole capability as this virtualization
+ * trick won't work. If >512GB resizable BARs start to appear, we
+ * might need an opt-in or reservation scheme in the kernel.
+ */
+ if (!(cap & PCI_REBAR_CAP_SIZES)) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Hide all sizes reported in the ctrl reg per above requirement. */
+ ctrl &= (PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE |
+ PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK |
+ PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX);
+
+ /*
+ * The BAR size field is RW, however we've mangled the capability
+ * register such that we only report a single size, ie. the current
+ * BAR size. A write of an unsupported value is undefined, therefore
+ * the register field is essentially RO.
+ */
+ vfio_add_emulated_long(vdev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CAP + (i * 8), cap, ~0);
+ vfio_add_emulated_long(vdev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL + (i * 8), ctrl, ~0);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
{
PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
@@ -2139,9 +2187,13 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
case 0: /* kernel masked capability */
case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV: /* Read-only VF BARs confuse OVMF */
case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI: /* XXX Needs next function virtualization */
- case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR: /* Can't expose read-only */
trace_vfio_add_ext_cap_dropped(vdev->vbasedev.name, cap_id, next);
break;
+ case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR:
+ if (!vfio_setup_rebar_ecap(vdev, next)) {
+ pcie_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, cap_ver, next, size);
+ }
+ break;
default:
pcie_add_capability(pdev, cap_id, cap_ver, next, size);
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 21:59 [PULL 0/3] VFIO updates 2023-05-09 Alex Williamson
2023-05-09 21:59 ` [PULL 1/3] vfio/pci: add support for VF token Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 16:51 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-05-23 16:54 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-10-20 13:32 ` Peter Maydell
2023-10-20 17:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-09 21:59 ` [PULL 2/3] vfio/migration: Skip log_sync during migration SETUP state Alex Williamson
2023-05-09 21:59 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-05-10 12:07 ` [PULL 0/3] VFIO updates 2023-05-09 Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230509215923.3186420-4-alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).