From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Jiri Denemark" <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
"Avihai Horon" <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
"Fiona Ebner" <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] migration/docs: How to migrate when hosts have different features
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 06:23:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230517062128-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515083201.55060-3-quintela@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:32:00AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Sometimes devices have different features depending of things outside
> of qemu. For instance the kernel. Document how to handle that cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
yes, e.g. vhost features are exactly like this.
> ---
>
> If you have some example to put here, I am all ears. I guess that
> virtio-* with some features that are on qemu but not on all kernel
> would do the trick, but I am not a virtio guru myself. Patches
> welcome.
> ---
> docs/devel/migration.rst | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/devel/migration.rst b/docs/devel/migration.rst
> index b4c4f3ec35..95e797ee60 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/migration.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/migration.rst
> @@ -357,6 +357,99 @@ machine types to have the right value: ::
> ...
> };
>
> +A device with diferent features on both sides
> +---------------------------------------------
> +
> +Let's assume that we are using the same QEMU binary on both sides,
> +just to make the things easier. But we have a device that has
> +different features on both sides of the migration. That can be
> +because the devices are different, because the kernel driver of both
> +devices have different features, whatever.
> +
> +How can we get this to work with migration. The way to do that is
> +"theoretically" easy. You have to get the features that the device
> +has in the source of the migration. The features that the device has
> +on the target of the migration, you get the intersection of the
> +features of both sides, and that is the way that you should launch
> +qemu.
> +
> +Notice that this is not completely related to qemu. The most
> +important thing here is that this should be handle by the managing
> +application that launches qemu. If qemu is configured correctly, the
> +migration will suceeed.
> +
> +Once that we have defined that, doing this is complicated. Almost all
> +devices are bad at being able to be launched with only some features
> +enabled. With one big exception: cpus.
> +
> +You can read the documentation for QEMU x86 cpu models here:
> +
> +https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/system/qemu-cpu-models.html
> +
> +See when they talk about migration they recommend that one chooses the
> +newest cpu model that is supported for all cpus.
> +
> +Let's say that we have:
> +
> +Host A:
> +
> +Device X has the feature Y
> +
> +Host B:
> +
> +Device X has not the feature Y
> +
> +If we try to migrate without any care from host A to host B, it will
> +fail because when migration tries to load the feature Y on
> +destination, it will find that the hardware is not there.
> +
> +Doing this would be the equivalent of doing with cpus:
> +
> +Host A:
> +
> +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host
> +
> +Host B:
> +
> +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host
> +
> +When both hosts have different cpu features this is waranteed to fail.
> +Especially if Host B has less features than host A. If host A has
> +less features than host B, sometimes it works. Important word of last
> +sentence is "sometimes".
> +
> +So, forgetting about cpu models and continuing with the -cpu host
> +example, let's see that the differences of the cpus is that Host A and
> +B have the following features:
> +
> +Features: 'pcid' 'stibp' 'taa-no'
> +Host A: X X
> +Host B: X
> +
> +And we want to migrate between them, the way configure both qemu cpu
> +will be:
> +
> +Host A:
> +
> +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,pcid=off,stibp=off
> +
> +Host B:
> +
> +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,taa-no=off
> +
> +And you would be able to migrate between them. It is responsability
> +of the management application or of the user to make sure that the
> +configuration is correct. QEMU don't know how to look at this kind of
> +features in general.
> +
> +Other devices have worse control about individual features. If they
> +want to be able to migrate between hosts that show different features,
> +the device needs a way to configure which ones it is going to use.
> +
> +In this section we have considered that we are using the same QEMU
> +binary in both sides of the migration. If we use different QEMU
> +versions process, then we need to have into account all other
> +differences and the examples become even more complicated.
How do people know what to do?
How about a tool that will help you get data from hosts
and then tell you how to configure qemu to make them
compatible?
> VMState
> -------
> --
> 2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 8:31 [PATCH v3 0/3] Migration documentation Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] migration: Add documentation for backwards compatiblity Juan Quintela
2023-05-16 23:39 ` Peter Xu
2023-05-18 1:47 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-10-17 13:59 ` Juan Quintela
2023-10-23 11:09 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] migration/docs: How to migrate when hosts have different features Juan Quintela
2023-05-16 23:51 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-17 14:05 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-17 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-10-17 14:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-15 8:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] migration/doc: We broke backwards compatibility Juan Quintela
2023-05-17 0:03 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-17 14:18 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-17 7:09 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-10-23 11:09 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-17 10:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-17 11:43 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-17 11:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-31 13:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230517062128-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).