From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PULL 17/18] aio-posix: do not nest poll handlers
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 11:05:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230518150525.GB403983@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdb97449-d234-0d98-ed02-733ec1d33ac1@tls.msk.ru>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1780 bytes --]
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:13:23AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 17.05.2023 19:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> >
> > QEMU's event loop supports nesting, which means that event handler
> > functions may themselves call aio_poll(). The condition that triggered a
> > handler must be reset before the nested aio_poll() call, otherwise the
> > same handler will be called and immediately re-enter aio_poll. This
> > leads to an infinite loop and stack exhaustion.
> >
> > Poll handlers are especially prone to this issue, because they typically
> > reset their condition by finishing the processing of pending work.
> > Unfortunately it is during the processing of pending work that nested
> > aio_poll() calls typically occur and the condition has not yet been
> > reset.
> >
> > Disable a poll handler during ->io_poll_ready() so that a nested
> > aio_poll() call cannot invoke ->io_poll_ready() again. As a result, the
> > disabled poll handler and its associated fd handler do not run during
> > the nested aio_poll(). Calling aio_set_fd_handler() from inside nested
> > aio_poll() could cause it to run again. If the fd handler is pending
> > inside nested aio_poll(), then it will also run again.
> >
> > In theory fd handlers can be affected by the same issue, but they are
> > more likely to reset the condition before calling nested aio_poll().
> >
> > This is a special case and it's somewhat complex, but I don't see a way
> > around it as long as nested aio_poll() is supported.
> >
> > Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186181
> > Fixes: c38270692593 ("block: Mark bdrv_co_io_(un)plug() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK")
>
> Is it not a stable-8.0 material?
Yes.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 16:50 [PULL 00/18] Block layer patches Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:50 ` [PULL 01/18] blockdev: refactor transaction to use Transaction API Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 02/18] blockdev: transactions: rename some things Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 03/18] blockdev: qmp_transaction: refactor loop to classic for Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 04/18] blockdev: transaction: refactor handling transaction properties Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 05/18] blockdev: use state.bitmap in block-dirty-bitmap-add action Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 06/18] blockdev: qmp_transaction: drop extra generic layer Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 07/18] docs/interop/qcow2.txt: fix description about "zlib" clusters Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 08/18] block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 09/18] block/export: Fix null pointer dereference in error path Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 10/18] qcow2: Unlock the graph in qcow2_do_open() where necessary Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 11/18] qemu-img: Take graph lock more selectively Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 12/18] test-bdrv-drain: " Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 13/18] test-bdrv-drain: Call bdrv_co_unref() in coroutine context Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 14/18] blockjob: Adhere to rate limit even when reentered early Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 15/18] graph-lock: Honour read locks even in the main thread Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 16/18] iotests/245: Check if 'compress' driver is available Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 17/18] aio-posix: do not nest poll handlers Kevin Wolf
2023-05-18 7:13 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-05-18 15:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2023-05-17 16:51 ` [PULL 18/18] tested: add test for nested aio_poll() in " Kevin Wolf
2023-05-17 19:10 ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-19 9:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-05-23 15:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230518150525.GB403983@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).