From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: vr_qemu@t-online.de, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] meson: remove -no-pie linker flag
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:08:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522080816.66320-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
The large comment in the patch says it all; the -no-pie flag is broken and
this is why it was not included in QEMU_LDFLAGS before commit a988b4c5614
("build: move remaining compiler flag tests to meson", 2023-05-18).
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1664
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
meson.build | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 0a5cdefd4d3d..6733b2917081 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -267,10 +267,15 @@ endif
# has explicitly disabled PIE we need to extend our cflags.
if not get_option('b_pie')
qemu_common_flags += cc.get_supported_arguments('-fno-pie')
- if not get_option('prefer_static')
- # No PIE is implied by -static which we added above.
- qemu_ldflags += cc.get_supported_link_arguments('-no-pie')
- endif
+ # What about linker flags? For a static build, no PIE is implied by -static
+ # which we added above. For dynamic linking, adding -no-pie is messy because
+ # it overrides -shared: the linker then wants to build an executable instead
+ # of a shared library and the build fails. Before moving this code to Meson,
+ # we went through a dozen different commits affecting the usage of -no-pie,
+ # ultimately settling for a completely broken one that added -no-pie to the
+ # compiler flags together with -fno-pie... except that -no-pie is a linker
+ # flag that has no effect on the compiler command line. So, don't add
+ # -no-pie anywhere and cross fingers.
endif
if not get_option('stack_protector').disabled()
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 8:08 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2023-05-22 8:19 ` [PATCH] meson: remove -no-pie linker flag Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-05-22 14:39 ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-23 7:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-22 15:54 ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-23 7:52 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-05-23 5:57 ` Volker Rümelin
2023-05-23 8:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-23 8:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-23 8:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-23 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-23 13:14 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230522080816.66320-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vr_qemu@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).