From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Xiao Guangrong" <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gshan@redhat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/15] memory-device: Support memory devices that statically consume multiple memslots
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:26:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230616092654.175518-8-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616092654.175518-1-david@redhat.com>
We want to support memory devices that have a memory region container as
device memory region where they statically map multiple RAM memory
regions.
We already have one device that uses a container as device memory region:
NVDIMMs. However, a NVDIMM always ends up consuming exactly one memslot.
Let's add support for that by asking the memory device via a new
callback how many memslots it consumes.
While at it in memory_device_check_addable(), perform the region size
check first and don't check separately for KVM and vhost, both things will
come in handy later.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/mem/memory-device.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/hw/mem/memory-device.h | 18 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/mem/memory-device.c b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
index 2f19183a25..a9dcc0c4ef 100644
--- a/hw/mem/memory-device.c
+++ b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
@@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ static unsigned int get_max_memslots(void)
return MIN(vhost_get_max_memslots(), kvm_get_max_memslots());
}
+/* Overall number of free memslots */
+static unsigned int get_free_memslots(void)
+{
+ return MIN(vhost_get_free_memslots(), kvm_get_free_memslots());
+}
+
/*
* The memslot soft limit for memory devices. The soft limit might change at
* runtime in corner cases (that should certainly be avoided), for example, when
@@ -126,21 +132,23 @@ void memory_devices_notify_vhost_device_added(void)
memory_devices_check_memslot_soft_limit(ms);
}
-static void memory_device_check_addable(MachineState *ms, MemoryRegion *mr,
- Error **errp)
+static unsigned int memory_device_get_memslots(MemoryDeviceState *md)
{
- const uint64_t used_region_size = ms->device_memory->used_region_size;
- const uint64_t size = memory_region_size(mr);
+ const MemoryDeviceClass *mdc = MEMORY_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(md);
- /* we will need a new memory slot for kvm and vhost */
- if (!kvm_get_free_memslots()) {
- error_setg(errp, "hypervisor has no free memory slots left");
- return;
- }
- if (!vhost_get_free_memslots()) {
- error_setg(errp, "a used vhost backend has no free memory slots left");
- return;
+ if (mdc->get_memslots) {
+ return mdc->get_memslots(md);
}
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static void memory_device_check_addable(MachineState *ms, MemoryDeviceState *md,
+ MemoryRegion *mr, Error **errp)
+{
+ const uint64_t used_region_size = ms->device_memory->used_region_size;
+ const unsigned int available_memslots = get_free_memslots();
+ const uint64_t size = memory_region_size(mr);
+ unsigned int required_memslots;
/* will we exceed the total amount of memory specified */
if (used_region_size + size < used_region_size ||
@@ -151,6 +159,14 @@ static void memory_device_check_addable(MachineState *ms, MemoryRegion *mr,
return;
}
+ /* ... are there still sufficient memslots available? */
+ required_memslots = memory_device_get_memslots(md);
+ if (available_memslots < required_memslots) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Insufficient memory slots for memory device"
+ "available. Available: %u, Required: %u",
+ available_memslots, required_memslots);
+ return;
+ }
}
static uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms,
@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ void memory_device_pre_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms,
goto out;
}
- memory_device_check_addable(ms, mr, &local_err);
+ memory_device_check_addable(ms, md, mr, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
@@ -349,7 +365,7 @@ void memory_device_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
g_assert(ms->device_memory);
ms->device_memory->used_region_size += memory_region_size(mr);
- ms->device_memory->required_memslots++;
+ ms->device_memory->required_memslots += memory_device_get_memslots(md);
memory_devices_check_memslot_soft_limit(ms);
memory_region_add_subregion(&ms->device_memory->mr,
addr - ms->device_memory->base, mr);
@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ void memory_device_unplug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
memory_region_del_subregion(&ms->device_memory->mr, mr);
ms->device_memory->used_region_size -= memory_region_size(mr);
- ms->device_memory->required_memslots--;
+ ms->device_memory->required_memslots -= memory_device_get_memslots(md);
trace_memory_device_unplug(DEVICE(md)->id ? DEVICE(md)->id : "",
mdc->get_addr(md));
}
diff --git a/include/hw/mem/memory-device.h b/include/hw/mem/memory-device.h
index 813c3b9da6..755f6304c6 100644
--- a/include/hw/mem/memory-device.h
+++ b/include/hw/mem/memory-device.h
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ typedef struct MemoryDeviceState MemoryDeviceState;
* successive memory regions are used, a covering memory region has to
* be provided. Scattered memory regions are not supported for single
* devices.
+ *
+ * The device memory region returned via @get_memory_region may either be a
+ * single RAM/ROM memory region or a memory region container with subregions
+ * that are RAM/ROM memory regions or aliases to RAM/ROM memory regions. Other
+ * memory regions or subregions are not supported.
*/
struct MemoryDeviceClass {
/* private */
@@ -89,6 +94,19 @@ struct MemoryDeviceClass {
*/
MemoryRegion *(*get_memory_region)(MemoryDeviceState *md, Error **errp);
+ /*
+ * Optional for memory devices that consume only a single memslot,
+ * required for all other memory devices: Return the number of memslots
+ * (distinct RAM memory regions in the device memory region) that are
+ * required by the device.
+ *
+ * If this function is not implemented, the assumption is "1".
+ *
+ * Called when (un)plugging the memory device, to check if the requirements
+ * can be satisfied, and to do proper accounting.
+ */
+ unsigned int (*get_memslots)(MemoryDeviceState *md);
+
/*
* Optional: Return the desired minimum alignment of the device in guest
* physical address space. The final alignment is computed based on this
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-16 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-16 9:26 [PATCH v1 00/15] virtio-mem: Expose device memory through multiple memslots David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] memory-device: Track the required memslots in DeviceMemoryState David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] kvm: Add stub for kvm_get_max_memslots() David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] vhost: Add vhost_get_max_memslots() David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] memory-device, vhost: Add a memslot soft limit for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] kvm: Return number of free memslots David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] vhost: " David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] memory-device: Track the actually used memslots in DeviceMemoryState David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] memory-device, vhost: Support memory devices that dynamically consume multiple memslots David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] pc-dimm: Provide pc_dimm_get_free_slots() to query free ram slots David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] memory-device: Support memory-devices with auto-detection of the number of memslots David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] memory: Clarify mapping requirements for RamDiscardManager David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] virtio-mem: Expose device memory via multiple memslots if enabled David Hildenbrand
2023-07-13 19:58 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2023-07-14 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] memory, vhost: Allow for marking memory device memory regions unmergeable David Hildenbrand
2023-06-16 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] virtio-mem: Mark memslot alias " David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230616092654.175518-8-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).