From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: Remove pointless NULL check in clock_adjtime handling
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:44:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230623144410.1837261-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw)
In the code for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime, we set the pointer phtx to
the address of the local variable htx. This means it can never be
NULL, but later in the code we check it for NULL anyway. Coverity
complains about this (CID 1507683) because the NULL check comes after
a call to clock_adjtime() that assumes it is non-NULL.
Since phtx is always &htx, and is used only in three places, it's not
really necessary. Remove it, bringing the code structure in to line
with that for TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime64, which already uses a simple
'&htx' when it wants a pointer to 'htx'.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index f2cb101d83c..7b2f9f7340e 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -10935,16 +10935,14 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
#if defined(TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime) && defined(CONFIG_CLOCK_ADJTIME)
case TARGET_NR_clock_adjtime:
{
- struct timex htx, *phtx = &htx;
+ struct timex htx;
- if (target_to_host_timex(phtx, arg2) != 0) {
+ if (target_to_host_timex(&htx, arg2) != 0) {
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
}
- ret = get_errno(clock_adjtime(arg1, phtx));
- if (!is_error(ret) && phtx) {
- if (host_to_target_timex(arg2, phtx) != 0) {
- return -TARGET_EFAULT;
- }
+ ret = get_errno(clock_adjtime(arg1, &htx));
+ if (!is_error(ret) && host_to_target_timex(arg2, &htx)) {
+ return -TARGET_EFAULT;
}
}
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-23 14:44 Peter Maydell [this message]
2023-06-23 15:18 ` [PATCH] linux-user: Remove pointless NULL check in clock_adjtime handling Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-06-26 8:27 ` Richard Henderson
2023-07-04 13:26 ` Peter Maydell
2023-07-13 13:10 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230623144410.1837261-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).