From: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] Revert "cputlb: Restrict SavedIOTLB to system emulation"
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:31:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230626160156.3938-2-anisinha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626160156.3938-1-anisinha@redhat.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This reverts commit d7ee93e24359703debf4137f4cc632563aa4e8d1.
That commit tries to make a field in the CPUState struct not be
present when CONFIG_USER_ONLY is set. Unfortunately, you can't
conditionally omit fields in structs like this based on ifdefs that
are set per-target. If you try it, then code in files compiled
per-target (where CONFIG_USER_ONLY is or can be set) will disagree
about the struct layout with files that are compiled once-only (where
this kind of ifdef is never set).
This manifests specifically in 'make check-tcg' failing, because code
in cpus-common.c that sets up the CPUState::cpu_index field puts it
at a different offset from the code in plugins/core.c in
qemu_plugin_vcpu_init_hook() which reads the cpu_index field. The
latter then hits an assert because from its point of view every
thread has a 0 cpu_index. There might be other weird behaviour too.
Mostly we catch this kind of bug because the CONFIG_whatever is
listed in include/exec/poison.h and so the reference to it in
build-once source files will then cause a compiler error.
Unfortunately CONFIG_USER_ONLY is an exception to that: we have some
places where we use it in "safe" ways in headers that will be seen by
once-only source files (e.g. ifdeffing out function prototypes) and
it would be a lot of refactoring to be able to get to a position
where we could poison it. This leaves us in a "you have to be
careful to walk around the bear trap" situation...
Fixes: d7ee93e243597 ("cputlb: Restrict SavedIOTLB to system emulation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230620175712.1331625-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
include/hw/core/cpu.h | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/core/cpu.h b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
index ee8d6b40b3..4871ad85f0 100644
--- a/include/hw/core/cpu.h
+++ b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ struct CPUWatchpoint {
QTAILQ_ENTRY(CPUWatchpoint) entry;
};
-#if defined(CONFIG_PLUGIN) && !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PLUGIN
/*
* For plugins we sometime need to save the resolved iotlb data before
* the memory regions get moved around by io_writex.
@@ -410,11 +410,9 @@ struct CPUState {
#ifdef CONFIG_PLUGIN
GArray *plugin_mem_cbs;
-#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
/* saved iotlb data from io_writex */
SavedIOTLB saved_iotlb;
-#endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
-#endif /* CONFIG_PLUGIN */
+#endif
/* TODO Move common fields from CPUArchState here. */
int cpu_index;
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 16:01 [PATCH v5 0/5] test and QEMU fixes to ensure proper PCIE device usage Ani Sinha
2023-06-26 16:01 ` Ani Sinha [this message]
2023-06-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] tests/acpi: allow changes in DSDT.noacpihp table blob Ani Sinha
2023-06-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] tests/acpi/bios-tables-test: use the correct slot on the pcie-root-port Ani Sinha
2023-06-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] tests/acpi/bios-tables-test: update acpi blob q35/DSDT.noacpihp Ani Sinha
2023-06-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] tests/qtest/hd-geo-test: fix incorrect pcie-root-port usage and simplify test Ani Sinha
2023-06-26 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] test and QEMU fixes to ensure proper PCIE device usage Ani Sinha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230626160156.3938-2-anisinha@redhat.com \
--to=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).