From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pci: Compare function number and ARI next function number
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 00:58:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230702004344-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230701070133.24877-5-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 04:01:22PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The function number must be lower than the next function number
> advertised with ARI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
I don't get this logic at all - where is the limitation coming from?
All I see in the spec is:
Next Function Number - With non-VFs, this field indicates the Function Number of the next higher
numbered Function in the Device, or 00h if there are no higher numbered Functions. Function 0 starts
this linked list of Functions.
The presence of Shadow Functions does not affect this field.
For VFs, this field is undefined since VFs are located using First VF Offset (see § Section 9.3.3.9 ) and VF
Stride (see § Section 9.3.3.10 ).
and
To improve the enumeration performance and create a more deterministic solution, software can
enumerate Functions through a linked list of Function Numbers. The next linked list element is
communicated through each Function’s ARI Capability Register.
i. Function 0 acts as the head of a linked list of Function Numbers. Software detects a
non-Zero Next Function Number field within the ARI Capability Register as the next
Function within the linked list. Software issues a configuration probe using the Bus Number
captured by the Device and the Function Number derived from the ARI Capability Register
to locate the next associated Function’s configuration space.
ii. Function Numbers may be sparse and non-sequential in their consumption by an ARI
Device.
> ---
> hw/pci/pci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index e2eb4c3b4a..568665ee42 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2059,6 +2059,8 @@ static void pci_qdev_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> bool is_default_rom;
> uint16_t class_id;
> + uint16_t ari;
> + uint16_t nextfn;
>
> /*
> * capped by systemd (see: udev-builtin-net_id.c)
> @@ -2121,6 +2123,19 @@ static void pci_qdev_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> }
> }
>
> + if (pci_is_express(pci_dev)) {
> + ari = pcie_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI);
> + if (ari) {
> + nextfn = (pci_get_long(pci_dev->config + ari + PCI_ARI_CAP) >> 8) & 0xff;
> + if (nextfn && (pci_dev->devfn & 0xff) >= nextfn) {
> + error_setg(errp, "PCI: function number %u is not lower than ARI next function number %u",
> + pci_dev->devfn & 0xff, nextfn);
> + pci_qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(pci_dev));
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (pci_dev->failover_pair_id) {
> if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(pci_dev))) {
> error_setg(errp, "failover primary device must be on "
> --
> 2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-02 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-01 7:01 [PATCH 0/4] pci: Compare function number and ARI next function number Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] docs: Fix next function numbers in SR/IOV documentation Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-01 14:31 ` Ani Sinha
2023-07-02 3:51 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] hw/nvme: Fix ARI next function numbers Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] igb: " Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-02 5:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-02 8:38 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-02 8:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-01 7:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] pci: Compare function number and ARI next function number Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-02 4:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-07-02 8:46 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-02 8:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-02 8:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-11 7:10 ` Ani Sinha
2023-07-11 8:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-02 5:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230702004344-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).