qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/pci: Warn when ARI/SR-IOV device has non-zero Function number
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 07:46:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230712073523-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230712112732.18617-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 08:27:32PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> Current SR/IOV implementations assume that hardcoded Function numbers
> are always available and will not conflict. It is somewhat non-trivial
> to make the Function numbers to use controllable to avoid Function
> number conflicts so ensure there is only one PF to make the assumption
> hold true.
> Also warn when non-SR/IOV multifunction was attempted with ARI enabled;
> ARI has the next Function number field register, and currently it's
> hardcoded to 0, which prevents non-SR/IOV multifunction. It is
> certainly possible to add a logic to determine the correct next Function
> number according to the configuration, but it's not worth since all
> ARI-capable devices are also SR/IOV devices, which do not support
> multiple PFs as stated above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>

I am not really interested in adding this stuff.
The real thing to focus on is fixing ARI emulation, not
warning users about ways in which it's broken.

> ---
>  hw/pci/pci.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index 784c02a182..50359a0f3a 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2124,23 +2124,48 @@ static void pci_qdev_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    /*
> -     * A PCIe Downstream Port that do not have ARI Forwarding enabled must
> -     * associate only Device 0 with the device attached to the bus
> -     * representing the Link from the Port (PCIe base spec rev 4.0 ver 0.3,
> -     * sec 7.3.1).
> -     * With ARI, PCI_SLOT() can return non-zero value as the traditional
> -     * 5-bit Device Number and 3-bit Function Number fields in its associated
> -     * Routing IDs, Requester IDs and Completer IDs are interpreted as a
> -     * single 8-bit Function Number. Hence, ignore ARI capable devices.
> -     */
> -    if (pci_is_express(pci_dev) &&
> -        !pcie_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI) &&
> -        pcie_has_upstream_port(pci_dev) &&
> -        PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn)) {
> -        warn_report("PCI: slot %d is not valid for %s,"
> -                    " parent device only allows plugging into slot 0.",
> -                    PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn), pci_dev->name);
> +    if (pci_is_express(pci_dev)) {
> +        /*
> +         * A PCIe Downstream Port that do not have ARI Forwarding enabled must
> +         * associate only Device 0 with the device attached to the bus
> +         * representing the Link from the Port (PCIe base spec rev 4.0 ver 0.3,
> +         * sec 7.3.1).
> +         * With ARI, PCI_SLOT() can return non-zero value as the traditional
> +         * 5-bit Device Number and 3-bit Function Number fields in its
> +         * associated Routing IDs, Requester IDs and Completer IDs are
> +         * interpreted as a single 8-bit Function Number. Hence, ignore ARI
> +         * capable devices.
> +         */
> +        if (!pcie_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI) &&
> +            pcie_has_upstream_port(pci_dev) &&
> +            PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn)) {
> +            warn_report("PCI: slot %d is not valid for %s,"
> +                        " parent device only allows plugging into slot 0.",
> +                        PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn), pci_dev->name);
> +        }
> +
> +        /*
> +         * Current SR/IOV implementations assume that hardcoded Function numbers
> +         * are always available. Ensure there is only one PF to make the
> +         * assumption hold true.
> +         */
> +        if (pcie_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV) &&
> +            PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn)) {
> +            warn_report("PCI: function %d is not valid for %s,"
> +                        " currently PF can only be assigned to function 0.",
> +                        PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn), pci_dev->name);
> +        }
> +
> +        /*
> +         * ARI has the next Function number field register, and currently it's
> +         * hardcoded to 0, which prevents non-SR/IOV multifunction.
> +         */
> +        if (pcie_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI) &&
> +            !pci_is_vf(pci_dev) && (pci_dev->devfn & 0xff)) {
> +            warn_report("PCI: function %d is not valid for %s,"
> +                        " non-SR/IOV multifunction is not supported with ARI enabled.",
> +                        pci_dev->devfn & 0xff, pci_dev->name);
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      if (pci_dev->failover_pair_id) {
> -- 
> 2.41.0



  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-12 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12 11:27 [PATCH] hw/pci: Warn when ARI/SR-IOV device has non-zero Function number Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-12 11:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-07-12 11:50   ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-07-12 12:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-13 13:32       ` Akihiko Odaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230712073523-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
    --cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).