qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org (open list:Network Block Dev...)
Subject: [PULL 13/14] nbd/client: Add safety check on chunk payload length
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 15:27:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719202736.2675295-29-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719202736.2675295-16-eblake@redhat.com>

Our existing use of structured replies either reads into a qiov capped
at 32M (NBD_CMD_READ) or caps allocation to 1000 bytes (see
NBD_MAX_MALLOC_PAYLOAD in block/nbd.c).  But the existing length
checks are rather late; if we encounter a buggy (or malicious) server
that sends a super-large payload length, we should drop the connection
right then rather than assuming the layer on top will be careful.
This becomes more important when we permit 64-bit lengths which are
even more likely to have the potential for attempted denial of service
abuse.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-ID: <20230608135653.2918540-8-eblake@redhat.com>
---
 nbd/client.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/nbd/client.c b/nbd/client.c
index ea3590ca3d0..1b5569556fe 100644
--- a/nbd/client.c
+++ b/nbd/client.c
@@ -1413,6 +1413,18 @@ static int nbd_receive_structured_reply_chunk(QIOChannel *ioc,
     chunk->cookie = be64_to_cpu(chunk->cookie);
     chunk->length = be32_to_cpu(chunk->length);

+    /*
+     * Because we use BLOCK_STATUS with REQ_ONE, and cap READ requests
+     * at 32M, no valid server should send us payload larger than
+     * this.  Even if we stopped using REQ_ONE, sane servers will cap
+     * the number of extents they return for block status.
+     */
+    if (chunk->length > NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE + sizeof(NBDStructuredReadData)) {
+        error_setg(errp, "server chunk %" PRIu32 " (%s) payload is too long",
+                   chunk->type, nbd_rep_lookup(chunk->type));
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
     return 0;
 }

-- 
2.41.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-19 20:27 [PULL 00/14] NBD patches for 2023-07-19 Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 01/14] qemu-nbd: pass structure into nbd_client_thread instead of plain char* Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 02/14] qemu-nbd: fix regression with qemu-nbd --fork run over ssh Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 03/14] qemu-nbd: properly report error if qemu_daemon() is failed Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 04/14] qemu-nbd: properly report error on error in dup2() after qemu_daemon() Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 05/14] qemu-nbd: handle dup2() error when qemu-nbd finished setup process Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 06/14] qemu-nbd: make verbose bool and local variable in main() Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 07/14] nbd/client: Use smarter assert Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 08/14] nbd: Consistent typedef usage in header Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 09/14] nbd/server: Prepare for alternate-size headers Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 10/14] nbd/server: Refactor to pass full request around Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 11/14] nbd: s/handle/cookie/ to match NBD spec Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 12/14] nbd/client: Simplify cookie vs. index computation Eric Blake
2023-07-19 20:27 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2023-07-19 20:27 ` [PULL 14/14] nbd: Use enum for various negotiation modes Eric Blake
2023-07-21  9:52 ` [PULL 00/14] NBD patches for 2023-07-19 Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230719202736.2675295-29-eblake@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).