Re: [PATCH 4/8] Introduce the CPU address space destruction function

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:15:09 +0800
xianglai li <lixianglai@loongson.cn> wrote:

> Introduce new functions to destroy CPU address space resources

s/functions/function/

> for cpu hot-(un)plug.
> 
> Cc: Xiaojuan Yang <yangxiaojuan@loongson.cn>
> Cc: Song Gao <gaosong@loongson.cn>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>
> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
> Cc: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: xianglai li <lixianglai@loongson.cn>
> ---
>  include/exec/cpu-common.h |  8 ++++++++
>  include/hw/core/cpu.h     |  1 +
>  softmmu/physmem.c         | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> index 87dc9a752c..27cd4d32b1 100644
> --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> @@ -120,6 +120,14 @@ size_t qemu_ram_pagesize_largest(void);
>   */
>  void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
>                              const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr);
> +/**
> + * cpu_address_space_destroy:
> + * @cpu: CPU for which address space needs to be destroyed
> + * @asidx: integer index of this address space
> + *
> + * Note that with KVM only one address space is supported.
> + */
> +void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx);
>  
>  void cpu_physical_memory_rw(hwaddr addr, void *buf,
>                              hwaddr len, bool is_write);
> diff --git a/include/hw/core/cpu.h b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> index fdcbe87352..d6d68dac12 100644
> --- a/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ struct CPUState {
>      QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, qemu_work_item) work_list;
>  
>      CPUAddressSpace *cpu_ases;
> +    int cpu_ases_ref_count;

perhaps renaming it to num_ases would be better

>      int num_ases;
and this one can be named num__ases_[total|max]


>      AddressSpace *as;
>      MemoryRegion *memory;
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index 3df73542e1..f4545b4508 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
>  
>      if (!cpu->cpu_ases) {
>          cpu->cpu_ases = g_new0(CPUAddressSpace, cpu->num_ases);
> +        cpu->cpu_ases_ref_count = cpu->num_ases;
>      }
>  
>      newas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
> @@ -775,6 +776,29 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx)
                                                 ^^^ should it be uintX_t ?

> +{
> +    CPUAddressSpace *cpuas;
> +
> +    assert(asidx < cpu->num_ases);
> +    assert(asidx == 0 || !kvm_enabled());
> +    assert(cpu->cpu_ases);
> +
> +    cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
> +    if (tcg_enabled()) {
> +        memory_listener_unregister(&cpuas->tcg_as_listener);
> +    }
> +
> +    address_space_destroy(cpuas->as);
> +
> +    cpu->cpu_ases_ref_count--;
> +    if (cpu->cpu_ases_ref_count == 0) {
> +        g_free(cpu->cpu_ases);
> +        cpu->cpu_ases = NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +}
> +
>  AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int asidx)
>  {
>      /* Return the AddressSpace corresponding to the specified index */